- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2020
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/11889
Title: | Insightful imaging: CT or MRI in accurately diagnosing acute appendicitis in children |
Authors: | Oprea, Raluca-Corina Cărăușu, Vadim-Costin |
Keywords: | computed tomography;acute appendicitis;magnetic resonance imaging |
Issue Date: | 2020 |
Publisher: | MedEspera |
Citation: | OPREA, Raluca-Corina, CĂRĂUȘU, Vadim-Costin. Insightful imaging: CT or MRI in accurately diagnosing acute appendicitis in children. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, p. 194-195. |
Abstract: | Introduction. Appendicitis is the most common condition requiring acute abdominal surgery
in children. Clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) is not always straightforward, and
abdominal ultrasound is specific but insufficiently sensitive. Computed tomography (CT) has
become favored but its use in children is discouraged due to ionizing radiation exposure.
Therefore, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered an alternative.
Aim of the study. This study aims to compare the accuracy of MRI with that of CT for the
diagnosis of AA in pediatric patients.
Materials and methods. For this systematic review, a search of the PubMed database was
conducted to select studies that used MRI for diagnosing pediatric patients with suspected
appendicitis. Studies that focused on evaluating the accuracy of MRI to diagnose appendicitis
were included. Studies with insufficient data to calculate the outcomes were excluded, as well as those older than ten years. Data for sensitivity and specificity of MRI were extracted from
the studies, then, using Barnard’s exact test, tested for significance compared to sensitivity and
specificity of CT.
Results. Eleven studies met eligibility criteria and were relevant to the question of this
systematic review. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (0.95–0.97) and 0.96 (0.94–0.98) for
MRI, as compared to 0.94 (0.92-0.97) and 0.95 (0.94-0.97) for CT (with 95% CI).
Conclusions. The authors concluded that the accuracies of MRI and CT for the diagnosis of
AA in pediatric patients are very similar, without any statistically significant difference in
accuracy. Therefore, MRI constitutes a viable and safer approach to diagnosing AA due to its
sensitivity, specificity and lack of exposure to radiation. |
URI: | https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/11889 |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2020
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|