- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2020
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/11976
Title: | Angle class I malocclusion. Principles of diagnosis and treatment |
Authors: | Botnaru, Corina-Nicoleta |
Keywords: | disharmony;Angle class I malocclusion;diagnosis;treatment;aesthetic;study;crowding;removable appliances;fixed appliances;dental alignement |
Issue Date: | 2020 |
Publisher: | MedEspera |
Citation: | BOTNARU, Corina-Nicoleta. Angle class I malocclusion. Principles of diagnosis and treatment. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, p. 355-356. |
Abstract: | Introduction. Nowadays the importance of the smile is being extraordinarily important. The
smile influences our mood, self confidence, thoughts and social relationships. Therefore,
owners of an aesthetic smile are more prone to smile than those with dento-alveolar
disharmonies. Following this aspect, one of the main reasons for the orthodontic treatment is
the aesthetical one. Angle class I malocclusions are characterized by dental alignment
disharmonies, when skeletal involvement is minor, presenting a normal antero-posterior
intermaxillary relationship.
Aim of the study. Etiopathogenic study, correct diagnosis and treatment of Angle class I
malocclusion.
Materials and methods.. A study was performed on 12 patients who had different degrees of
severity of dento-maxillary crowding. For diagnostical purpose the following investigations
were done: panoramic radiography (OPG), cephalometric and model analysis. An individual
treatment plan was done for each patient. Two methods of treatment were selected: removable
and fixed orthodontic appliances.Results. The treatment method was chosen according to severity degree and patient's age.
Thus, 8 patients of 12 were treated through fixed appliances, while the other 4 persons were
using removable orthodontic appliances. Cooperative patients during the growth period and
that have no severe teeth crowding, have wore removable appliances for 9 to 12 months, while
the others were treated through fixed adhesive system within about 1,5 years.
Conclusions. Patients that wore removable appliances, followed by fixed appliances, achieved
their aesthetic objectives, maximum intercuspation and a functional occlusion. |
URI: | https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/11976 |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2020
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|