|
- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2020
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/12006
Title: | The particularities of life quality of patients with oncological diseases |
Authors: | Corcodel, Gheorghe |
Keywords: | quality of life;physical function;physical role;pain;general health |
Issue Date: | 2020 |
Publisher: | MedEspera |
Citation: | CORCODEL, Gheorghe. The particularities of life quality of patients with oncological diseases. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, p. 311-312. |
Abstract: | Introduction. The quality of life is the perception of individuals about their goals,
expectations, interests and ideas, satisfaction and happiness among their cultural values.
Quality of life is the physical effect of patients (movement, physical activities and the ability
to succeed in work and family responsibilities), social (social activities, being beneficial, body
image, anxiety and depression) and psychological (life satisfaction, social support need and
role function) for well-being.
Aim of the study. Analyzing the medico-social and psycho-emotional particularities of
patients with oncological pathologies through the standardized questionnairewith the
elaboration of suggestions on the research topic.
Materials and methods. The cross-selective study (2019-2020) was conducted within the
Oncological Institutethrough the WHO standardized questionnaire SF-36&author annexes.
The sample included 70 adults of average age 51.67±1.92 (SD = 10.49); men - 53.3% and
women - 46.7%; depending on the urban / rural locality, the sample was selected 50% to 50%
cases; the agreement not to disclose personal data was signed.
Results.Cancer patients experience some psychological problems - stress, anxiety, depression;
some physiological side effects - hair loss, pain, fatigue, nausea, vomiting; some social side
effects - social isolation, role and loss of function; and, finally, a deteriorating quality of life.
In the study case the use of SF-36 structured these answers: 1) Physical function – 50%(95%
CI: 43.70to56.29); 2) Role limitations due to physical health- 23.33%(95% CI:
19.59to27.06);3) Pain- 56.33%(95% CI:51.41 to 61.25);4) General health - 48.13%(95%
CI:44.81 to 51.45); 5) Role limitations due to emotional problems- 37.78%(95% CI:25.24 to
50.32);6) Energy/ fatigue - 59.37%(95% CI: 54.19to 64.55); 7) Emotional well-being- 66.44%
(95% CI:61.71 to71.17);8) Social functioning-61.67% (95% CI:56.18to 67.16).At the same
time, according to sex, sleep quality was distributed: 1) very good: men - 12.5% and women
respectively - 7.1%; 2) good: men - 56.2% and women - 42.9%; 3) bad: men - 31.2% and
women respectively – 50.0%, the one confirms differences according to sex.
Conclusions. Many factors have positive and negative effects on the quality of life. Fatigue,
anxiety, worrying for the future and family, difficulties in meeting basic requirements and changes in the body image which aggravate the quality of life. Social support, economic
security and confidence in recovery improve the quality of life. However, the research results
alarm our major psycho-emotional and socio-medical particularities problems. |
URI: | https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12006 |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2020
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|