|
- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2016
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/12360
Title: | Difficult cases of cochlear implantation |
Authors: | Diab, K.M. Kondratchikov, D.S. Pashchinina, O.A. Mikhalevich, A.E. Zukhba, A.G. Hijazi, A.A. Sokolova, V.N. Balakireva, O.A. |
Keywords: | cochlear implantation;inner ear malformations;cochlear ossificans;Ménière's disease;tympanomastoidal cavity |
Issue Date: | 2016 |
Publisher: | MedEspera |
Citation: | DIAB, K.M., KONDRATCHIKOV, D.S., PASHCHININA, O.A., MIKHALEVICH, A.E., ZUKHBA, A.G., HIJAZI, A.A., SOKOLOVA, V.N., BALAKIREVA, O.A. Difficult cases of cochlear implantation. In: MedEspera: the 6th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2016, p. 168. |
Abstract: | Background. Currently there is a tendency to addition of cochlear implantation indications (CI)
in patients with inner and middle ear malformations, cochlear ossificans and Meniere's disease. Also, CI
after canal wall down mastoidectomy is difficult clinical case in ear surgery.
Aim.Improve postoperative auditory performance of patients with profound sensorineural
hearing loss (deafness), and complicated pathology of the inner or middle ear through the optimization
of cochlear implantation surgical tactic.
Materials and methods. 42 patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss who underwent
CI were analyzed. Cases were divided into four groups: 12 patients with cochlea ossification after
meningitis (group 1), 19 patients with inner ear malformation (group 2), 9 patients underwent canal wall
down mastoidectomy (CWDM, group 3) and two patients with Meniere's disease (group 4). Surgical
techniques differ depending on the pathology. In all cases were performed intraoperatively implant
telemetry and stapes reflex registration. Postoperatively the mastoid cavity was controlled.
Results. Stapes reflex was registered intraoperativly in 8 patients of the first group. Number of
input electrodes depended on the degree of cochlea ossification and the type of inner ear abnormality.
The CSF leak occurring in 10 cases of inner ear anomalies was successfully repaired and completely
stopped. The using of proposing CI technique in patients after canal wall down mastoidectomy gives
good results of performed cavity healing, no cases of electrode extrusion or protrusion in the long term
follow up period. Patients with Meniere's disease and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who underwent
simultaneous operations (endolymphatic sac drainage and cochlear implants), showed satisfactory
results audioverbal rehabilitation and marked decreasing of vestibular symptoms.
Conclusion. Using the proposed surgical techniques allow to maximal electrode insertion into
malformed and ossified cochlea. The performed tunnels and cartilage electrode covering in postoperative
cavity of patients after CWDM prevent cases of extrusion and protrusion of the electrode. Simultaneous
CI and endolymphatic sac drainage gives a good results in patients with late stage Meniere's disease and
profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. |
URI: | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12360 |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2016
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|