|
- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2014
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/19378
Title: | Occupational HIV infection in health care workers: what to take into account ? |
Authors: | Chihaia, Madalina-Adriana lliescu, Andreea Beatrice |
Keywords: | HIV infection;occupational exposure;health care workers;risk of transmission |
Issue Date: | 2014 |
Publisher: | Ministry of Health of the Republic of Moldova, State Medical and Pharmaceutical University Nicolae Testemitanu, Medical Students and Residents Association |
Citation: | CHIHAIA, Madalina-Adriana, lLIESCU, Andreea Beatrice. Occupational HIV infection in health care workers: what to take into account ? In: MedEspera: the 5th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2014, pp. 256-257. |
Abstract: | Introduction: Through the nature of their profession, the workers of the medical system,
doctors and nurses, are assuming the exposure to pathogen factors. The primary prevention is the
main objective and all the efforts are supposed to be directed in this way. Though, to err is human
and sometimes accidents happen. What is to be done in this situation?
Purpose and objectives: The aim of this paper is to present the ethical aspects of the
occupational acquired HIV infection in health care workers, starting from a real case.
In the Intensive Care Unit, while inserting a peripheral venous catheter, a doctor accidentally
causes an injury to his finger with the contaminated needle. The patient was known as HIV infected
and under appropriate treatment. The blood tests proved that until that moment the doctor was healthy. According to the protocol, new blood tests were performed after 6 months, demonstrating
the presence of antibodies against the Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1.
Discussion: In this situation, there are some ethical issues regarding the doctor and his
patients as well, because this relationship represents the fundament of the medical act.
The HIV positive status of the doctor heightens several aspects to reflect upon. Should this
person be allowed to keep working in the medical system? Then, may changing the specialty be
required, particularly in the case of the surgical departments? In what measure will this doctor be
supported by the administrative structures?
But there are also things to see and understand from the patient's viewpoint. Would he accept
being treated by this doctor, if he knew his status? Because indeed, the patient has the right to
choose the person that will consult and treat him. However, the main controversy is that the
decision will not be so much influenced by the real risk of transmission, which appears to be quite
low in the scientific literature (under 0,3%), but primarily by the patient’s lack of knowledge and
the phobia that persists around this disease.
Conclusion: Occupational accidents in the medical system are a reality. Beside the human
sufferance, the HIV infected health care worker will also fear the social and professional
repercussions. Moreover, it would not be equitant for the patient to be exposed to the risk of
infection, even if that is considerably low. Obviously, everyone’s priority is the prevention, but if it
happens, which could be the most ethical solution and the best for everyone? |
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: | MedEspera: The 5th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 14-17, 2014, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova |
URI: | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/19378 |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2014
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|