USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/12516
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPiterschi, Alexandru-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-03T13:48:11Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-03T13:48:11Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationPITERSCHI, Alexandru. Nondismembered pyeloplasty. In: MedEspera: the 6th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2016, p. 184-185.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12516-
dc.descriptionDepartment of Urology and Surgical Nephrology, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, The 6th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 12-14, 2016en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Despite of wide spread of dismembered pyeloplasty, in some cases like lengthy ureteral stricture and a poorly accessible intrarenal pelvis this type of pyeloplasty are not favorable. Nondismembered techniques like Foley Y-V and Fenger, being technically less demanding and intuitively less traumatic to the ureter’s nerves and vasculature in selected cases may have some advantages over dismembered techniques. This study was undertaken to document our experience with nondismemberedpyeloplasty in adults; the primary aims were to determine the indications and overall success rate. Materials and methods: This study included 10 patients (6 male and 4 female, mean age 36,1 years, range 21 -62) who underwent nondismembered pyeloplasty in the Department of Urology from Clinical Republican Hospital between January 2009 and November 2014. Preoperatively, all patients were evaluated with intravenous urography and isotope scans. The uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) was corrected by either Fengerplasty (4) or Foley Y-V plasty (6). Results: In all cases nondismembered pyeloplasty were performed in patients with small symptomatic hydronephrosis. When the etiology of UPJO was a high ureteral insertion we performed more often Fenger (75%) then Foley Y-V pyeloplasty (16,7%). In the presence of congenital stenosis the first choice was Foley Y-V pyeloplasty (83,3%). The mean operative time was 93,7 minutes. No intraoperative complications were seen. Mean postoperative hospitalization 13,3 days. The only postoperative complication was a case of pyelonephritis that occurred in a patient with UPJO and concomitant urolithiasis. After 12 months of follow-up there has been no evidence of obstruction, complete resolution of clinical symptoms was achieved in all patients. Conclusions: In selected cases nondismembered pyeloplasty could be a good treatment option for patients with UPJO. Being simpler from technical point of view they allow us to achieve same high result as dismembered techniques.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMedEsperaen_US
dc.subjecturetero-pelvic junction obstructionen_US
dc.subjectnondismembered pyeloplastyen_US
dc.subjectFoley Y-V pyeloplastyen_US
dc.subjectfengerpyeloplastyen_US
dc.titleNondismembered pyeloplastyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:MedEspera 2016

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NONDISMEMBERED_PYELOPLASTY.PDF32.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback