USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/19592
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVladanov, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorPleșacov, Alexei
dc.contributor.authorColta, Artur
dc.contributor.authorCeban, Emil
dc.contributor.authorGhicavii, Vitalii
dc.contributor.authorScutelnic, Ghenadie
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-20T13:19:20Z
dc.date.available2022-01-20T13:19:20Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationVLADANOV, Ivan, PLESACOV, Alexei, COLTA, Artur, CEBAN, Emil, GHICAVII, Vitalii, SCUTELNIC, Ghenadie. Transurethral „en bloc“ resection technique in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. In: Archives of the Balcan Medical Union. 2020, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 257-263. https://doi.org/10.31688/ABMU.2020.55.2.07en_US
dc.identifier.issn2558-815X
dc.identifier.urihttps://umbalk.org/transurethral-en-bloc-resection-technique-in-non-muscle-invasive-bladder-cancer/
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.31688/ABMU.2020.55.2.07
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/19592
dc.descriptionRepublican Clinical Hospital „Timofei Mosneaga“, Department of Urology and Surgical Nephrology, State University of Medicine and Pharmacy „Nicolae Testemitanu“, Chisinau, Republic of Moldovaen_US
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT. Introduction. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumours (TURBT) is the standard approach to bladder tumour removal; however, it has several disadvantages. The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of „en bloc“ resection of non-muscle invasive bladder tumours (ERBT) by using the conventional monopolar „Hook“ resection electrode. Material and methods. ERBT and TURBT procedures were conducted in 67 and in 85 patients respectively, diagnosed with superficial bladder tumours. In the ERBT group, the tumours were removed retrograde en bloc, under direct vision, via a conventional monopolar „Hook“ electrode. Clinical pathological, intra-operative and post-operative patients’ data were compared retrospectively between both groups (ERBT and TURBT). Results. Of the 152 patients, 67 underwent ERBT and 85 were treated with TURBT. Both groups were comparable in clinical characteristics. ERBT has been performed as safely and effectively as TURBT. There were no significant differences in the operative time and intraoperative or postoperative surgical complications. The comparative recurrence rates were similar for both groups during up to 24-month follow-up. The detrusor muscle fibers were histologically identified in 100% of ERBT tumour samples and marginal tumour bases, and only in 80% of post-TURBT samples. Conclusions. ERBT is a feasible and safe technique for removing superficial bladder tumours using a monopolar „Hook“ resection, with the same advantages of a proper tumour resection, as well as possibility to collect good quality tumour samples and bladder tumour base specimen for pathological diagnosis and staging compared to standard TURBT.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherALL Publishing Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of the Balkan Medical Unionen_US
dc.subjecten bloc resectionen_US
dc.subjectnon-muscle invasive bladder canceren_US
dc.subjectERBTen_US
dc.subjectTURBTen_US
dc.titleTransurethral „en bloc“ resection technique in non-muscle invasive bladder canceren_US
dc.title.alternativeTechnique de la résection transurétrale „en-bloc“ du cancer de la vessie sans envahissement du muscleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:ARTICOLE ȘTIINȚIFICE

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback