USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/19594
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBradu, Andrei
dc.contributor.authorCeban, Emil
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-20T13:40:27Z
dc.date.available2022-01-20T13:40:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBRADU, Andrei, CEBAN, Emil. Necessity of antibacterial prophylaxis in the treatment of reno-ureteral lithiasis by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. A prospective descriptive study. In: Archives of the Balcan Medical Union. 2020, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 264-268. https://doi.org/10.31688/ABMU.2020.55.2.08en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/19594
dc.descriptionDepartment of Urology and Surgical Nephrology, „Nicolae Testemitanu“ State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldovaen_US
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT. Introduction. Due to the increase in the incidence of reno-ureteral lithiasis worldwide from 1% to 15%, varying according to age, sex, race, and geographical location, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy remains the method of choice in the treatment of reno-ureteral lithiasis. The need for antibacterial prophylaxis is required only in well-defined cases, uroculture with antibacterial sensitivity being crucial in order to reduce the infectious complications. The objective of the study was to evaluate the need for antibiotic administration and to detect risk factors for the development of post-ESWL bacteriuria. Material and methods. Between 05 Nov 2018 – 10 Dec 2019, a group of 120 patients with the diagnosis of reno-ureteral lithiasis was selected, who underwent ESWL treatment in Department of Urology and Surgical Nephrology from Republican Clinical Hospital „Timofei Mosneaga“. In all 120 patients, urine sample was taken before and after ESWL. In all patients included in the study, uroculture with antibiogram was performed. Results. The uroculture results obtained before ESWL were positive in 25 (20.84%) patients without any clinical symptoms and absence of leukocytes in the general urine analysis more than 10 per high power field. At the same time, the number of positive urine culture after ESWL increased significantly in 47 patients. Conclusions. Antibiotic prophylaxis is not justified in the absence of definite risk factors such as positive urine culture before ESWL, JJ stent or nephrostome and a history of infectious reno-ureteral lithiasis or recurrent urinary tract infections.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherALL Publishing Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of the Balkan Medical Union
dc.subjectESWLen_US
dc.subjectreno-ureteral lithiasisen_US
dc.subjectantibacterial therapyen_US
dc.titleNecessity of antibacterial prophylaxis in the treatment of reno-ureteral lithiasis by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. A prospective descriptive studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeLa nécessité d’une prophylaxie antibactérienne dans le traitement de la lithiase réno-urétérale par lithotripsie extracorporelle par ondes de choc. Une étude descriptive prospectivefr
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:ARTICOLE ȘTIINȚIFICE

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback