USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/26269
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBicec, Iuliana-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-03T11:34:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-03T11:34:15Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationBICEC, Iuliana. Criteriile de argumentare a protocolului de tratament endodontic. In: Sănătatea, medicina şi bioetica în societatea contemporană: studii inter şi pluridisciplinare = Health, Medicine and Bioethics in Contemporary Society: Inter- and Pluridisciplinary Studies: mater. conf. șt. internaț., ed. a 6-a, 6-7 octombrie 2023. Chişinău: Print-Caro, 2023, pp. 272-277. ISBN 978-9975-82-334-0.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-9975-82-334-0-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/26269-
dc.description.abstractThe goal of endodontic treatment is to debride and clear the root canal system of infected pulp tissue so that the canal space can be shaped and prepared to be filled with an inert material, thereby preventing or minimizing any chance of reinfection. However, failure occurs when endodontic treatment does not meet clinical standards and principles. Two approaches have been proposed to solve this problem. In the first approach, residual bacteria are eliminated or prevented from repopulating the canal system by inserting a dressing into the root canal, in an additional visit, generally falling into the following categories: phenolic derivatives (eugenol, paramonochlorophenol camphorate, phenol camphorate, metacresyl acetate , creosote from beech wood), aldehydes (formocresol), halogens (potassium iodide), calcium hydroxide, antibiotics or other combinations. The decision on the treatment tactics remains at the choice of the dentist, depending on the clinical condition, the general condition of the patient, the technical possibilities and the materials at his disposal, as well as his experience.en_US
dc.language.isoroen_US
dc.publisherUniversitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie „Nicolae Testemiţanu” din Republica Moldova, Centrul Național de Bioetică din Republica Moldova, Institutul Național de Patologie „Victor Babeș”, București, România, Universitatea Națională de Sănătate „P. Shupyk” din Ucraina, Institutul de Fiziologie și Sanocreatologie, USM, Republica Moldovaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSănătatea, medicina şi bioetica în societatea contemporană: studii inter şi pluridisciplinare: Materialele Conferinței Științifice Internaționale, ediția a VI-a, 6-7 octombrie 2023en_US
dc.titleCriteriile de argumentare a protocolului de tratament endodonticen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe argumentation criteria of the endodontic treatment protocolen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Conferința Științifică Internațională : „Sănătatea, medicina și bioetica în societatea contemporană: studii inter și pluridisciplinare”, ediția a VI-a, 6-7 octombrie 2023

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Criteriile_de_argumentare_a_protocolului_de_tratament_endodontic.pdf285.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback