DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Baetu, Alexandru Emil | |
dc.contributor.author | Dragus, Emoke | |
dc.contributor.author | Duca, Anca | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-07T05:57:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-07T05:57:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | BAETU, Alexandru Emil, DRAGUS, Emoke, DUCA, Anca. Evolution of resistance to cefepime in patients with urinary tract infection. In: MedEspera: the 6th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2016, p. 89-90. | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-9975-3028-3-8. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/11045 | |
dc.description | University of Medicine and Pharmacy Targu Mures, The 6th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 12-14, 2016 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common infectious diseases
occurring in either the community or healthcare setting.1 Uncomplicated UTIs typically occur in the
healthy adult non-pregnant woman, while complicated UTIs (cUTIs) may occur in all sexes and age
groups and are frequently Associated with either structural or functional urinary tract abnormalities.
Examples include foreign bodies such as calculi indwelling catheters or other drainage devices,
obstruction, immunosuppression, renal failure, renal transplantation and pregnancy
Aim: The purpose of our study is to highlight the alarming evolution of the resistance at
Cefepime(the only cephalosporine of fourth generation) in patients with urinary tract infection.
Material and Methods: Records from 1041 patients where retrospectively reviewed. Antibiotic
susceptibility of the isolated pathogens was tested for commonly-used antibiotics(including Cefepime)
by Kirby-Bauer technique according to NCCLS guidelines. All statistical analyses were performed SPSS
software. Statistical significance was considered for a p value < 0.05(for Pearson Chi-Square test), and
all p values were 2-sided.
Results: In 2012 Cefepime resistance was 31,85%, in 2013: 32,46% and in 2014 36,17%.
Cefepime has good efficiency on urinary tract infection caused by E.coli comparing with the other
cephalosporines(p<0.0001) but for Klebsiella pneumoniae Cefotaxime has the best results.(p<0.0001).
Conclusions: Cefepim resistance increased almost 5 percent these years. And this is a very big
problem because is the only fourth generation cephalosporin that we have. In literature empirical
treatment and self-medication is incriminated but we need further studies to provide accurate
information. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | MedEspera | en_US |
dc.title | Evolution of resistance to cefepime in patients with urinary tract infection | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2016
|