- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2018
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/11340
Title: | Treatment options for acute complications of gastroduodenal ulcer |
Authors: | Moisei, Felicia |
Keywords: | gastroduodenal ulcer;bleeding;perforation |
Issue Date: | 2018 |
Publisher: | MedEspera |
Citation: | MOISEI, Felicia. Treatment options for acute complications of gastroduodenal ulcer. In: MedEspera: the 7th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2018, p. 135. |
Abstract: | Introduction. The gastroduodenal ulcer holds the first place in the structure of the digestive tract
morbidity. Diversification of anti-ulcer high end drugs with different action mechanism
constituted the base for decrease of number of patients who suffered from gastroduodenal ulcer.
This also has influenced the frequency of acute complications of gastroduodenal ulcer such as
perforation and bleeding ulcer.
Aim of the study. To study the treatment options for gastroduodenal ulcer acute complications.
Materials and methods. A retrospective study based on patients treated for gastroduodenal
ulcer who were hospitalized during the period 2016-2017 in CMH no.1 was performed.
Results. During a year in General Surgery Clinic of PMSI CMH no.1 there were treated 106
(94.6%) patients with upper digestive bleeding and 6 (5.4%) patients who were suffering of
gastroduodenal perforation. From those 106 patients with bleeding who were treated in the clinic
41 (38.6%) had peptic ulcer as the origin of bleeding. All the patients with digestive bleeding
underwent diagnostic endoscopy. In 41 patients with ulcer bleeding the primary emergency
endoscopy revealed the following division of bleeding according to Forrest classification: Forrest
IA–3 (7.3%) patients, IB in 8 (19.5%) cases, IIA–10 (24.3%) patients, IIB 15 (36.5%), IIC in 6
(14.6%) and Forrest III in 3 (2.6%) patients. In case of active bleedings and in patients with signs
of stigmata of recent bleeding, the primary diagnostic endoscopy was also curative. In 36
(33.9%) patients the primary endoscopic haemostasis was successful and in 5 (4.7%) another
endoscopy with repeated haemostasis was necessary. In 3 (2.8%) cases the repeated haemostasis
failed and the patients underwent emergency surgery because of continuous bleeding. Thus,
during a year, the patients who suffered from perforated ulcer and upper digestive bleeding
underwent surgical treatment 10 patients - 6 (60%) for perforation and 4 (40%) for bleeding.
Conclusions. Currently, the surgical treatment is rarely used for the ulcer disease, mostly for
cases of acute complications of ulcer which are the perforation and massive bleeding which is
not possible to be treated by endoscopy. |
URI: | https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/Abastract-Book-2018.pdf http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/11340 |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2018
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|