|
- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2020
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/11742
Title: | Clinical and genetic study of thrombophilia in pregnancy |
Authors: | Borș, Elena |
Keywords: | hereditary thrombophilia;recurrent pregnancy loss;primary female infertility |
Issue Date: | 2020 |
Publisher: | MedEspera |
Citation: | BORȘ, Elena. Clinical and genetic study of thrombophilia in pregnancy. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, p. 286-287. |
Abstract: | Introduction. Thrombophilia is defined as an abnormal coagulation state of blood that
increases the risk of thrombosis. Pregnancy represents a physiological hypercoagulation state.
But, women with acquired and hereditary thrombophilia are at increased risk of developingvenous thromboembolism and other associated gestational vascular complications like
Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL), preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, and placental
abruption during pregnancy. These complications are a major cause of maternal and fetal
morbidity and mortality.Aim of the study. This study focuses on the women who reported RPL, without any positive
pregnancy and the identification of genetic factors that lead to the formation of thrombosis (F2
G20210A, F5 G1691A, MTHFR C677T, MTHFR A1289C, MTR A2756G, MTRR A66G),
involved in fibrinolysis (PAI-1 4G/5G) and their association with primary female infertility.
Materials and methods. Research design was constructed as case-control type. The case
group was represented by 44 patients with RPL, without any positive pregnancy, with normal
karyotype, and lack of other causes (intrauterine infections, uterine pathology) responsible for
the RPL. The control group included 57 patients with 2 positive pregnancies who did not
receive anticoagulant treatment. The Odds Ratio (OR) was calculated for the case group and
control group, at a 95% confidence interval, and p values <0,005 were considered statistically
significant. OR>1 demonstrate a strong association between mutation and RPL, OR<1 show a
weak association.
Results. We found that G1691A mutation in F5 gene encoding factor V (Leiden) (for
heterozygous genotype OR=8,84; 95% CI; 1,02-76,42; p<0,05) and mutation G20210A in gene
F2 encoding factor II (prothrombin), (for heterozygous genotype OR=7,18; 95% CI; 0,81-
63,87; p<0,05), are major risk factors for RPL and primary female infertility. Carriers of the
homozygous genotype after mutant allele were not determined in either group. The 4G/5G
polymorphism of the PAI-1 gene, in this study was not associated with RPL and primary female
infertility. Analysis of genes involved in folate cycle as MTHFR C677T mutation (OR=3,33;
95% CI; 1,37-8,09; p<0,05 for the heterozygous genotype and OR=3,73; 95% CI; 0,99-14,05;
p<0,05 for the homozygous genotype after the mutant allele), MTR mutation A2756G (for the
heterozygous genotype OR=2,91; 95%CI; 1,19-7,08; p<0,05 and for the homozygous genotype
after the mutant allele OR=6,30; 95%CI; 1,17-34,03; p<0,05), MTRR mutation A66G (for the
heterozygous genotype OR=2,40; 95%CI; 1,02-5,62; p<0,05 and for the homozygous genotype
after the mutant allele OR=5,77; 95%CI; 0,99-33,68; p<0,05),demonstrated that these
polymorphisms are major risk factors of RPL and primary female infertility. A1289C mutation
of the MTHFR gene was not associated with RPL and primary female infertility.
Conclusion. According to the results of the study, it is recommended the genetic diagnosis of
all patients with RPL, without organic or infectious causes, for detection of the genetic factors
involved in hereditary thrombophilia. |
URI: | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/11742 medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2020
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|