DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Cheptanaru, Olga | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-09T12:30:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-09T12:30:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | CHEPTANARU, Olga, GODOROJA, Pavel. Implant supported restoration in single-tooth replacement. In: The Moldovan Medical Journal. 2018, vol. 61, no 1, pp. 55-62. ISSN 2537-6373. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2537-6373 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2537-6381 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/1174 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1186202 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://moldmedjournal.md/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/moldmedjournal-2018-61-1-full-issue.pdf | |
dc.description | Pavel Godoroja Department of Dental Propaedeutics, Nicolae Testemitsanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, the Republic of Moldova | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The implant-prosthetic restoration in single missing tooth is a viable treatment option for the functional rehabilitation of tooth loss. Several
published studies show that the deadline and the type of functional loading of the implant for single missing teeth is not decisive for the survival and
success rate of the implant. Although the conventional protocol is still the “gold standard”, the immediate loading of dental implants in the fresh postextraction socket of the aesthetic area has an excellent prognosis. Immediate functional loading is successfully adopted to minimize the treatment time
with immediate and impact benefit on the patient’s quality of life and satisfaction. The aesthetic result is not yet systematically included in the success
criteria of the therapy through implant, although a trend for this is more common in recent publications, particularly in publications evaluating the implant
prosthetic rehabilitation in the anterior maxilla and mandible. In order to obtain optimal aesthetic results, it is necessary to take into account the other
aesthetic parameters, together with the chosen material for the fabrication of the implant-supported single crown and the type of prosthetic abutment.
Conclusions: The systematic review of the contemporary specialty literature examines the types of implantations and implant-supported restorations for
single tooth replacement, the survival rates of the implant, the survival of the crown on the implant and the successful implant, incidence of biological,
technical and aesthetical complications of the implants and prosthetic restorations on implants, the quality of life related to the oral health to patients
with implant-prosthetic treatment. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | The Scientific Medical Association of the Republic of Moldova | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Moldovan Medical Journal | |
dc.subject | single missing tooth | en_US |
dc.subject | implant-prosthetic restoration | en_US |
dc.subject | success rate | en_US |
dc.subject | aesthetic result | en_US |
dc.subject | complications | en_US |
dc.subject.ddc | UDC: 616.314-089.843 | |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implants | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implants, Single-Tooth--adverse effects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Prosthesis--methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Restoration, Permanent--methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Denture, Partial, Fixed | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Esthetics, Dental | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Quality of Life | en_US |
dc.title | Implant supported restoration in single-tooth replacement | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | The Moldovan Medical Journal, Vol. 61, No 1, February 2018
|