DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Balasa, Erica-Gabriela | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rusu, Maria | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-06T06:11:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-06T06:11:10Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | BALASA, Erica-Gabriela, RUSU, Maria. Medical and bioethical dilemma in case of medical error. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, p. 322. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/11968 | - |
dc.description | Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Nicolae
Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, The 8th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, September 24-26, 2020 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction. In Republic of Moldova, the medical error is encountered more often than we
think. This isn’t known because every day, people are forced to keep silent about some
irregularities, and this may affect both, the patient and the medical staff. Annually, the number
of cases of medical errors that had been reported is unrealistically low. Even the law does not
come to the aid of people affected by malpractice, error or mistake, as all these terms are
covered by the term of medical error.
Aim of the study. Detecting the actual prevalence of medical errors and the level of protection
available to patients.
Materials and methods. This descriptive-analytical study was conducted on 20 medical
workers. Data was collected using a valid and reliable questionnaire, consisting of two parts:
demographic information and questions about the level of protection perceived by medical
workers and their role in solving medical errors that they witnessed.
Results. From the analysis of the questionnaires we found that 69% of the medical workers
surveyed witnessed at least one case of medical error. As a result of this error, no action was
taken in 71% of cases and 23% of cases ended in a harsh reprimand. This may be a consequence
of the fact that in more than half of the cases, even patients or their relatives did not notice that
a violation had occurred to them, and if they did, most of them overlooked it. Even in the
context of the legislation, there was not much data, with 55% saying that the state is not taking
sufficient measures to prevent or cases of medical errors.
Conclusions. 1. The number of medical errors exceeds expectations. 2. The population does
not have sufficient medical education to detect some medical violations. 3. Preventing and
combating the majority of medical violations is legally impossible. 4. Although medical
workers would like to combat medical errors or mistakes, it is not only up to them, the change
must occur at a social and political level. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | MedEspera | en_US |
dc.subject | medical error | en_US |
dc.subject | bioethics | en_US |
dc.subject | patient protection | en_US |
dc.subject | moral dilemma | en_US |
dc.title | Medical and bioethical dilemma in case of medical error | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2020
|