DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Eni, Stanislav | - |
dc.contributor.author | Strîșca, Stanislav | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-08T14:47:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-08T14:47:53Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | ENI, Stanislav, STRÎȘCA, Stanislav. Alternative implantation in the early rehabilitation of patients with upper jaw atrophy. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, p. 328. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12019 | - |
dc.description | Department of Oral and Maxillofacial
Surgery Arsenie Gutan, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and
Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, The 8th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, September 24-26, 2020 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction. In the implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of patients, clinicians often meet
extremely difficult situations, when the bone support in the lateral areas of the jaws is
insufficient for implant insertion. Under these conditions, alternative implantation methods
were proposed, which were hardly accepted, but the success demonstrated over time
determines the frequent use of the methods.
Aim of the study. To enhance the effectiveness of early rehabilitation of patients with
maxillary atrophy by using alternative implantation.
Materials and methods.. This study was axed on 48 patients (21 women and 27 males) aged
28-67 years, conducted between 2016 and 2020 at the SRL “OMNI DENT”. CT scans and
OPG were taken in all patients before and after implant placement. In 41 cases implants were
inserted using “Fast and Fixed” protocol, in other 7 cases zygomatic implants were used.
Results. In all 48 cases a high primary stability of implants was achieved and all the patients
were rehabilitated with temporary implant supported overdenture on the 4.17-th day in mean
(std.dev 1.23). In 3 cases implant supported overdenture fixation was delayed to 10-th and 12-
th day. In total 255 implants were inserted, of which 2 was lost during the osseointegration.
The success rate of this procedure was 99.2%. In total 21 Zygomatic implants were inserted
with 100% success rate.
Conclusions. The use of alternative implantation in early rehabilitation of patients, even
though, is an effective and predictable method with a high rate of success, is technique
sensitive, surgeon has to be experienced based on good preoperative planning. The main
advantages are: early rehabilitation, less invasive, avoiding bone grafting procedure, reduced
costs, all this helps to raise the patient’s quality of life. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | MedEspera | en_US |
dc.subject | alternative | en_US |
dc.subject | zygomatic implant | en_US |
dc.subject | early rehabilitation | en_US |
dc.title | Alternative implantation in the early rehabilitation of patients with upper jaw atrophy | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2020
|