DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Schipschi, Nicolae | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-12T08:23:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-12T08:23:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | SCHIPSCHI, Nicolae. Determination the effectiveness of the use of various guided bone regeneration techniques in implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of patients. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, p. 325-326. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12097 | - |
dc.description | Department of Oral and
Maxillo-facial Surgery Arsenie Gutan, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and
Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, The 8th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, September 24-26, 2020 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction. Currently, aesthetic and functional dental treatment is widely requested among
patients and the demands are increasing. But very rarely when the patient has perfect conditions
having often bone deficiency. Guided tissue regeneration is the process of restoring or
rebuilding the lost or damaged surface with the ultimate goal of obtaining completely or
partially its tissue and function. The main purpose in tissue regeneration of the bone deficient
field is to provide optimal and necessary conditions for the implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous patient. Implant-supported prosthesis in many cases is possible only due to
regenerative methods.
Aim of the study. Determination of the effectiveness of the use of bone additions with
xenogenic materials and collagen membranes in comparison with autogenous grafts.
Materials and methods.. A clinical study has been performed in three patients with different
types of bone atrophies. These patients were treated using xeno- and autogenous grafts, as well
as with combination of the upper mentioned. In all the cases, buccal bone augmentation has
been performed. The postoperative care and healing period (6 months) was evaluated for any
healing events. At the end of healing, implants placement has been performed and the
integration of graft as well as the quality of bony tissue were appreciated.
Results. The use of guided bone regeneration techniques provides satisfactory results under
certain conditions and clinical indications. The best result was observed when using autogenic
grafts and the Khoury technique. The xeno-genic material usage for GBR without being mixed
with the autogenic bone graft did not give successful results due to a poor integration of graft.
The usage of collagen and hydroxyapatite for contour grafting showed satisfactory result as a
volume maintaining procedure.
Conclusions. The use of guided bone regeneration techniques with autogenic bone leads to a
significantly higher bone quality compared to xenogenic ones. Application of guided bone
regeneration technique with xenogen material can give successful results without mixing with
autogenic bone only in situations of contour bone addition, in order to maintain a contour of
augmented area. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | MedEspera | en_US |
dc.subject | bone regeneration | en_US |
dc.subject | implant-prosthetic rehabilitation | en_US |
dc.title | Determination the effectiveness of the use of various guided bone regeneration techniques in implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of patients | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2020
|