DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Vaidelytė, Birutė | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ūsaitė, Akvilė | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-13T10:00:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-13T10:00:27Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | VAIDELYTĖ, Birutė, ŪSAITĖ, Akvilė. The factors influencing personal choice in non prescription drugs related pain management. In: MedEspera: the 6th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2016, pp. 348-350. | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-9975-3028-3-8. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12150 | - |
dc.description | Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, The 6th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 12-14, 2016 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Pain is a common medical problem, and relief of pain is an important therapeutic
goal. Although mild and moderate pain by outpatients is most commonly treated with over-the-counter
drugs. Over the past decade, there have been growing concerns about the harm — abuse, as well as
serious injury and death — caused by the use of over-the-counter painkillers. These concerns have
emerged in parallel with the evolving understanding of the importance of pain management in medical
care. It’s important to maintain the balance between providing access to pain medications for those who
need them, and on the other hand, managing the variety of risks posed by painkilling drugs. Especially
nowadays when drug consumption between society has increased significantly. More and more people
have been hospitalized because of these drugs side effects. This fact shows that society in Europe aren’t
informed about over-the-counter painkillers harmful influence to their health.
The aim of this study is to evaluate ftors influencing non prescription drugs against mildmoderate
pain choice.
Objectives:
1. To evaluate pharmaceutical advertisement influence for non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
(NAID) or paracetamol usage in society.
2. To assess the links between the most commonly used non prescription painkillers and
respondents professions(related to biomedical sciences or not related to biomedical sciences).
3. To determine the links between respondents age, gender, type of pain they suffer and the way
they choose to reduce the pain.
Materials and methods: The online questionnaire form was applied for two biggest Lithuania’s
cities - Vilnius and Kaunas - citizens with the aim to evaluate different age and professions Lithuanian
citizens knowledge about pain pharmaceutical agents and their pain management.
The questionnaire was designed to reveal respondent’s gender, age, sociodemographic,
experienced pain and knowledge of medicine drugs against pain (painkillers) factors.
Total 99 respondents in the age of 19-80 years were interviewed. According the gender
respondents distributed equally by 51 (51.1%) males and 48 (49.9%) females.
The statistical analysis of the research was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0 version.
For categorical data analysis χ2 and Fisher’s exact tests were performed. P <0.05 was evaluated as
statistically significant.
Discussion results: The 24.2 % (n=24) respondents answered that their choice and knowledge
for painkillers usage was affected by radio, TV or the internet advertisements, the others noticed that
they relay their pain management on friends & relatives (n=75), as well as doctors (n=16) and
pharmacists (n=27) recommendations. There was found significant difference between paracetamol
(p=0.049) and Solpodeine (p=0.012) choice. Advertisements - affected respondents chose Solpodeine as
the main painkiller 25.5 %, although in non advertisement - affected respondents Solpodeine was chosen
only 5.3 %. 95,8 % of advertisement - affected respondents do not use paracetamol for pain management,
when more than 1/5 (21.3 % ) of non advertisement - affected people answered that they use paracetamol
as main painkiller. The biomedical profession related persons more often chosen paracetamol 37.8 %
and Ibuprophen 70.4% as main painkillers than others 4.8% and 40.3%, respectively, p<0.05. Also there
was found the link between paracetamol and ibuprophen pain management usage and gender: women
were more likely to choose paracetamol and ibuprophen 72.5 % and 66.7 % as men (respectively 6.3%
and 41.7%).
Solpodeine as pain management choice selected 25.5 % advertisement affected people, when in
non advertisement affected respondents group this choice marked just 5.3 %. The biomedical profession
related persons were more often as their choice painkiller marked paracetamol (37.8 % ) and ibuprophen
(70.4%) than others (4.8% and 40.3%, respectively), p<0.05. Also there was found the link between
paracetamol and ibuprophen pain management usage and gender. Women (respectively 72.5 % and 66.7
% )were more likely to choose paracetamol and ibuprophen as men (respectively 6.3% and 41.7%). The
back pain suffering persons were tend to choice NAID drugs in ointment form (P<0.05). No links were
found between other painkillers such Analgin, Ketanov, Dolmen, Aspirin, Diclofenac and the
respondents choice in pain management, sociodemographical, profession and advertisement factors.
Conclusion: Although the respondents affected with pharmaceutical advertisement rarely use
paracetamol for pain management, they are more likely to choose solpodeine than those who were not
affected by advertisement.
Biomedical related profession Lithuania citizens are more tend to choose pain management with
paracetamol and ibuprophen than no biomedical profession citizens.
There was relationship between paracetamol and ibuprophen choice and also there was link
between pain type and drugs form. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | MedEspera | en_US |
dc.subject | NAID | en_US |
dc.subject | paracetamol | en_US |
dc.subject | aspirin | en_US |
dc.subject | mild-moderate pain | en_US |
dc.subject | pain management | en_US |
dc.title | The factors influencing personal choice in non prescription drugs related pain management | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2016
|