- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2020
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/12263
Title: | Munchausen Syndrome, differential diagnosis |
Authors: | Guțu, Biatricia |
Keywords: | Munchausen syndrome;Munchausen syndrome by proxy;factitious disorders;differential diagnosis |
Issue Date: | 2020 |
Publisher: | MedEspera |
Citation: | GUȚU, Biatricia. Munchausen Syndrome, differential diagnosis. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, p. 156. |
Abstract: | Introduction. Münchausen Syndrome is a severe psychiatric disorder, also called factitious
disorder imposed on self, was first characterized by Richard Asher, in 1951. This syndrome is
characterized by the deliberate falsification of the history of the disease, the patient produces
or invents an imagined medical pathology to benefit from investigations, medical procedures
and treatment. The patient is dependent on hospitalization and aims to get the attention of the
medical staff that he misleads by inventing clinical symptoms that are not real. Furthermore,
standard therapeutic interventions may not be effective in persons with Munchausen syndrome,
causing increased confusion for the care team.
Aim of the study. Studying the particularities of the clinical evolution and diferential diagnosis
of Munchausen Syndrome.
Materials and methods. All relevant information was obtained from literature review.
Results. Munchausen syndrome is a disease that can be masked in the form of other mental
illnesses. At present, it is important to make a correct difference between them. Differential
diagnosis of factitious disorder is also made with somatoform disorders such as: conversion
disorder; or pain disorder. The diagnosis of Munchausen syndrome is difficult because of the
lack of correctness in the patient's statements. The hospitals where the patients are consulted
by an interdisciplinary team, theoretically is the ideal environment to identify a factitious
disorder and the place where appropriate measures would be taken to initiate the management
of the disorder, especially in the case of abuse of a child, of an elderly person, or a person with
disabilities. The correct diagnosis and management of cases with factitious disorders at the
admitting department are fundamental for a good prognosis and a correct treatment.
Conclusions. Diagnosing Munchausen syndrome can be very hard because of all of the
dishonesty associated with this disorder. Doctors must first rule out any possible physical and
mental illnesses before considering a diagnosis of Munchausen syndrome. The lack of
identification may lead to many unnecessary laboratory tests and procedures which may
prolong hospitalizations and increase costs of health systems. So far, no effective treatments
have been demonstrated through well-conducted studies, and no diagnostic criteria exist; these
facts may explain the little knowledge of students and health practitioners about these
conditions. Munchausen syndromes as well as Munchausen syndrome by proxy are variants of
factitious disorders. They are challenging conditions in Medicine despite the current
technology and knowledge on mind-body boundaries. |
URI: | https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12263 |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2020
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|