- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2020
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/12274
Title: | Modern aspects of the laboratory diagnosis of the systemic lupus erythematosus |
Authors: | Roșca, Anastasia |
Keywords: | systemic lupus erythematosus;autoantibodies;biomarkers |
Issue Date: | 2020 |
Publisher: | MedEspera |
Citation: | ROȘCA, Anastasia. Modern aspects of the laboratory diagnosis of the systemic lupus erythematosus. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, p. 164. |
Abstract: | Introduction. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multisystem autoimmune
disease with a highly variable clinical course, that usually develops in young women and is
characterized by the presence of a wide profile of utoantibodies. SLE is a non‐infectious
autoimmune disease, that cannot be cured, but it can be controlled. The long-term prognosis
for SLE has improved markedly in recent decades because of earlier diagnosis.
Aim of the study. update the aspects of the laboratory diagnosis of the SLE.
Materials and methods. A literature review on the aspects of the laboratory diagnosis of the
SLE was made, using a search of electronic databases such as PubMed and the MedLine
Library, including current guidelines and expert recommendations.
Results. SLE is a multi-organ system autoimmune disease with clinical and serological
heterogeneity, which can represent a challenge for physician in terms of diagnosis. If there is a
clinical suspicion of lupus, blood tests (including serological marker tests) should be checked.
Serum anti-nuclear antibody (ANA), anti-ds-DNA antibody and anti-Smith (Sm) antibody are
important biomarkers. ANAs are present in ∼95% of SLE patients. The presence of anti-ds-
DNA antibodies, low complement levels or anti-Sm antibodies are highly predictive of a
diagnosis of SLE in patients with relevant clinical features. Anti-Ro/La and anti-RNP
antibodies are lessspecific markers of SLE as they are found in other autoimmune rheumatic
disorders as well as SLE. Tumor necrosis factor or soluble Interleukin‐2 receptor values may
reflect disease activity, but they are not specific for SLE. IgG antinucleosome antibodies have
proven to be helpful in diagnosis of patients in the absence of anti-dsDNA or anti-Sm
antibodies. A systemic review and meta-analysis showed that anti-nucleosome antibodies may
actually be more sensitive than antidsDNA antibodies in the diagnosis of SLE (59.9% vs.
52.4%). Anti-ribosomal P antibody is another potential biomarker for the diagnosis of SLE,
with a high specificity (99.4%), but low sensitivity (14.2%). T serum anti-C1q antibody and
urinary monocytic chemoattractant protein-1 (UMCP-1) may be valuable biomarkers for lupus
nephritis. Interferon-α is a potential biomarker for certain forms of neuropsychiatric
involvement.
Conclusions. SLE is a heterogeneous disease in which diagnosis is not always easy. There is
still no available biomarker that is pathognomonic forthe disease. Currently, the diagnosis of
SLE still requires “old-fashioned” clinical acumen with the assistance of standardized clinical
and laboratory criteria. Further diagnostic investigations depend on the symptoms of SLE and
should be carried out in cooperation with medical specialists from the appropriate disciplines. |
URI: | https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12274 |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2020
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|