DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Șerban, Al. O. | |
dc.contributor.author | Obadă, B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Borgazi, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Zekra, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Botnaru, V. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-31T17:10:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-31T17:10:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | ȘERBAN, Al. O., OBADĂ, B., BORGAZI, E. et al. Difficulties in classification of malleolar fractures. In: Arta Medica. 2016, nr. 4(61), p. 20. ISSN 1810-1852. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1810-1852 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://artamedica.md/old_issues/ArtaMedica_61.pdf | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12453 | |
dc.description | Clinic of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Emergency County Hospital Constanța, Romania, Al VIII-lea Congres Naţional de Ortopedie și Traumatologie cu participare internaţională 12-14 octombrie 2016 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective
Classification of malleolar fractures are a matter of debate. The Lauge Hansen and the AO-classification are defined as
complicated, where the Weber-classification is too simplistic. In trimalleolar fracture is the role and the size of the posterior
fragment an additional complicating factor.
Material. Methods.
Interobserver study: four observers (2 traumasurgeons, 2 radiologists) classified 100 X-rays to the AO-, the Lauge-Hansenand
the Danis-Weber classification. In case of a trimalleolar fracture they were asked to measure the size of the posterior
fragment.
Results
Within the Weber classification, there is a lot of discussion whether the fracture is a proximal “Weber B” or a distal “Weber
C”. This problem also exists in the AO-classification. In addition, it is not possible to classify the isolated medial malleolus
fracture. The biggest problem of the Lauge-Hansen classification is that anamnestic (and in particular radiological) the
trauma-mechanism remains unclear. As a result, it is possible to classify identically fractures in different groups. Small
posterior avulsion fragments prove difficult to determine on the initial X-ray. Overshadowing of the fibula is the avultion
of a very small fragment shows to be limiting factor. Fixation if posterior fragments is, in most literature, dependent on the
size if the posterior fragments. Some authors advocate that not only size but most important, the congrunecy of tibiotalar
articular surface should be leading in choice of treatment for anatomic restoration. In that case, assessment of size if the
posterior fragment is less important where the detection of smaller dislocated posterior fragment is of much more value.
Conclusions
The ankle X-ray is in most cases a useful tool in detecting clinical relevant fractures of the posterior malleolus however
preoperative CT evaluation might be a very useful addition both in pre-operative planning and detection from smaller
dislocated posterior fragments. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Asociaţia chirurgilor “Nicolae Anestiadi” din Republica Moldova | en_US |
dc.subject | malleolar fracture | en_US |
dc.subject | classification | en_US |
dc.subject | ankle | en_US |
dc.title | Difficulties in classification of malleolar fractures | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Arta Medica Vol. 61, No 4, 2016 ediție specială
|