USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/12453
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorȘerban, Al. O.
dc.contributor.authorObadă, B.
dc.contributor.authorBorgazi, E.
dc.contributor.authorZekra, M.
dc.contributor.authorBotnaru, V.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-31T17:10:20Z
dc.date.available2020-10-31T17:10:20Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationȘERBAN, Al. O., OBADĂ, B., BORGAZI, E. et al. Difficulties in classification of malleolar fractures. In: Arta Medica. 2016, nr. 4(61), p. 20. ISSN 1810-1852.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1810-1852
dc.identifier.urihttps://artamedica.md/old_issues/ArtaMedica_61.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12453
dc.descriptionClinic of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Emergency County Hospital Constanța, Romania, Al VIII-lea Congres Naţional de Ortopedie și Traumatologie cu participare internaţională 12-14 octombrie 2016en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective Classification of malleolar fractures are a matter of debate. The Lauge Hansen and the AO-classification are defined as complicated, where the Weber-classification is too simplistic. In trimalleolar fracture is the role and the size of the posterior fragment an additional complicating factor. Material. Methods. Interobserver study: four observers (2 traumasurgeons, 2 radiologists) classified 100 X-rays to the AO-, the Lauge-Hansenand the Danis-Weber classification. In case of a trimalleolar fracture they were asked to measure the size of the posterior fragment. Results Within the Weber classification, there is a lot of discussion whether the fracture is a proximal “Weber B” or a distal “Weber C”. This problem also exists in the AO-classification. In addition, it is not possible to classify the isolated medial malleolus fracture. The biggest problem of the Lauge-Hansen classification is that anamnestic (and in particular radiological) the trauma-mechanism remains unclear. As a result, it is possible to classify identically fractures in different groups. Small posterior avulsion fragments prove difficult to determine on the initial X-ray. Overshadowing of the fibula is the avultion of a very small fragment shows to be limiting factor. Fixation if posterior fragments is, in most literature, dependent on the size if the posterior fragments. Some authors advocate that not only size but most important, the congrunecy of tibiotalar articular surface should be leading in choice of treatment for anatomic restoration. In that case, assessment of size if the posterior fragment is less important where the detection of smaller dislocated posterior fragment is of much more value. Conclusions The ankle X-ray is in most cases a useful tool in detecting clinical relevant fractures of the posterior malleolus however preoperative CT evaluation might be a very useful addition both in pre-operative planning and detection from smaller dislocated posterior fragments.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAsociaţia chirurgilor “Nicolae Anestiadi” din Republica Moldovaen_US
dc.subjectmalleolar fractureen_US
dc.subjectclassificationen_US
dc.subjectankleen_US
dc.titleDifficulties in classification of malleolar fracturesen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
Appears in Collections:Arta Medica Vol. 61, No 4, 2016 ediție specială

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Difficulties_in_classification_of_malleolar_fractures.pdf157.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback