USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/12456
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorObadă, B.
dc.contributor.authorȘerban, Al. O.
dc.contributor.authorAnderlik, St.
dc.contributor.authorBorgazi, E.
dc.contributor.authorBotnaru, V.
dc.contributor.authorColtofeanu, A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-31T17:59:54Z
dc.date.available2020-10-31T17:59:54Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationOBADĂ, B., ȘERBAN, Al. O., ANDERLIK, St. et al. Femoral aseptic pseudarthrosis with implant failure –cases presentation. In: Arta Medica. 2016, nr. 4(61), pp. 21-22. ISSN 1810-1852.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1810-1852
dc.identifier.urihttps://artamedica.md/old_issues/ArtaMedica_61.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12456
dc.descriptionClinic of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Emergency County Hospital Constanța, Romania, Al VIII-lea Congres Naţional de Ortopedie și Traumatologie cu participare internaţională 12-14 octombrie 2016en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective Management of the femoral implant failure is one the hardest situation faced in traumatology. Our study try to understand the causes which lead to pseudarthrosis after primary osteosynthesis of femoral fracture with breakage of the implant and to establish a therapeutical protocol which can be applied to these cases. Material. Methods. We performed a retrospective study between 2011 and 2014, analyzing all patients with femur fractures treated in our hospital or in other hospitals but which came in our Clinic with pseudarthrosis and implant failure or breakage. Results A total of cases were introduced in our study: 2 trochanteric fractures, 3 trochantero-diaphiseal fractures, 2 diaphiseal fractures, 1 distal periprothetic fracture, 1 supracondylar fracture. Every case had own particularities and the therapeutical stages were: choice of surgical approach, method of implant ablation with minimal bone loss, more stable osteosinthesis, bone graft. The time of the operation should be as short as possible to minimize infection risk. Conclusions Pseudarthrosis of the femoral fracture with breakage of the implant is a tough situation for any surgeon. Understanding the causes which produced the implant failure and establishing a therapeutical strategy to correct them are the goal of the treatment.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAsociaţia chirurgilor “Nicolae Anestiadi” din Republica Moldovaen_US
dc.subjectfemoral fractureen_US
dc.subjectimplant failureen_US
dc.subjectbreakageen_US
dc.subjectpseudarthrosisen_US
dc.titleFemoral aseptic pseudarthrosis with implant failure –cases presentationen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
Appears in Collections:Arta Medica Vol. 61, No 4, 2016 ediție specială

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Femoral_aseptic_pseudarthrosis_with_implant_failure_cases_presentation.pdf248.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback