USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/12833
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGutu, E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-10T15:28:16Z
dc.date.available2020-11-10T15:28:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.identifier.urihttps://stiinta.usmf.md/ro/manifestari-stiintifice/zilele-universitatii
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12833
dc.descriptionDepartment of General Surgery and Semiology nr. 3, Nicolae Testemiţanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, Congresul consacrat aniversării a 75-a de la fondarea Universității de Stat de Medicină și Farmacie „Nicolae Testemițanu” din Republica Moldova, Ziua internațională a științei pentru pace și dezvoltareen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. Selection between surgery and continuation of conservative treatment is often challenging in patients with recently stopped ulcer bleeding. Decision is made on estimation of rebleeding (R) risk, individual for each patient. Aim of the study was to compare results of urgent (U) and early elective (EE) surgery, and to determine their reliance by grade of patients’ operative risk. Material and methods. The study is based on result analysis of 285 patients, underwent surgery for bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer. The influence of factors, which determine “operative risk” (age and comorbidity), on results of urgent (for R) and early elective (for prevention of R) procedures was assessed. Results. There are no significant differences of treatment results between U and EE surgery in “low operative risk” patients (less than 60 years and without concomitant illnesses). In contrast in patients with “high operative risk” (over 60 years and/or with concomitant pathology), U procedure was associated by increased rate of postoperative morbidity (71,8% vs 25,9%, p < 0,001) and mortality (29,4% vs 4,9%, p < 0,001), comparative with EE surgery. Conclusions. Risk of postoperative complications and death in patients under 60 years old and without comorbidity do not depend on type of surgery, therefore indications for EE surgery should be limited. In these patients in occurrence of R, repeated endoscopic hemostasis and insistent conservative treatment are preferable. Conversely “high operative risk” patients may easier support EE surgery, than repeated hemorrhage, and EE procedure for prevention of R is indicated early.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie "Nicolae Testemiţanu" din Republica Moldovaen_US
dc.subjectgastroduodenal ulceren_US
dc.subjectbleedingen_US
dc.subjectoperative risken_US
dc.subjectsurgeryen_US
dc.titleUrgent surgery for bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer vs. operative risken_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
Appears in Collections:Culegere de postere

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
URGENT_SURGERY_FOR_BLEEDING_GASTRODUODENAL_ULCER_VS._OPERATIVE_RISK.pdf161.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback