USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/12851
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOrleoglo, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorCiobanu, Nicolae-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-11T07:26:15Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-11T07:26:15Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-
dc.identifier.urihttps://stiinta.usmf.md/ro/manifestari-stiintifice/zilele-universitatii-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12851-
dc.descriptionUSMF "Nicolae Testemițanu", Congresul consacrat aniversării a 75-a de la fondarea Universității de Stat de Medicină și Farmacie „Nicolae Testemițanu” din Republica Moldova, Ziua internațională a științei pentru pace și dezvoltareen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. The risk-based approach has always underpinned the manufacture and applicable regulation of medical devices and medicines. Quality risk management includes systematic processes designed to coordinate, facilitate and improve science-based decision making with respect to risk. Possible steps used to initiate and plan a risk management process depend on the type of the product. For medicinal products, the main regulation is GMP through ICH Q9 recommendations, which classify the risk management as a systematic process. The medical devices are manufactured basing on ISO 13485 with a separate standard, ISO 14971 that classifies risk management as a systematic application of management. Purpose. The purpose of the study is to provide a comparison concerning risk management techniques and the QRM process used for the manufacturing of medicines and medical devices as the overall steps seems to be similar yet the regulations are different. Materials and methods. A qualitative research included the examination of internal documentation of a pharmaceutical manufacturing company, and close analysis and comparison of both ISO standarts and ICH recommendations. The obtained data was triangulated hence several methods for the verification of the obtained data were used. Conclusions. ICH Q9 & ISO 14971 are mostly similar in their requirements, even though the QRM steps in the standard are more complex.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie "Nicolae Testemiţanu"en_US
dc.subjectquality systemen_US
dc.subjectrisk managementen_US
dc.subjectmanufacturingen_US
dc.subjectmedical devicesen_US
dc.subjectmedicinal productsen_US
dc.subjectGMPen_US
dc.subjectISOen_US
dc.titleRisk management in medicinal products and medical device manufacturingen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
Appears in Collections:Culegere de postere

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RISK_MANAGEMENT_IN_MEDICINAL_PRODUCTS_AND.pdf263.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback