DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Eni, Stanislav | |
dc.contributor.author | Sîrbu, Dumitru | |
dc.contributor.author | Strîșcă, Stanislav | |
dc.contributor.author | Ghețiu, Alexandru | |
dc.contributor.author | Nuca, Dumitru | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-17T19:43:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-17T19:43:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-10 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://stiinta.usmf.md/ro/manifestari-stiintifice/zilele-universitatii | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/13021 | |
dc.description | Universitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie „Nicolae Testemiţanu”, Catedra de chirurgie OMF şi implantologie orală „Arsenie Guţan”, Chisinau, Republica Moldova, Catedra de Odontologie, Parodontologie și Patologie Orală, Congresul consacrat aniversării a 75-a de la fondarea Universității de Stat de Medicină și Farmacie „Nicolae Testemițanu” din Republica Moldova, Ziua internațională a științei pentru pace și dezvoltare | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction.
Insufficient bone volume is difficult to manage
in rehabilitating patients with maxillary
atrophy. The currently available solutions are:
• increasing the bone amount followed by
standard implantation
• the alternative method by using zygomatic
implants without preimplantation bone
growth.
Purpose.
Comparative evaluation of standard versus
alternative methods of rehabilitation in
patients with severe maxillary atrophy.
Material and methods.
Study was axed on 12 patients, aged 32 - 67
years, mean age 54.5 years, divided into 2
groups. Patients in group I (7) were
rehabilitated by zygomatic implants without
bone grafting, and patients in group 2 (5)
were rehabilitated by bone grafting, with
delayed implantation. Patient data was
processed in Sidexis 4.2 and Microsoft Excel.
Results.
In group I, 4.42 implants / patient were used, 1
intervention was performed under general
anesthesia, 1 under local anesthesia with
intravenous sedation and 5 under local
anesthesia only. The patients underwent a
single surgery with an average duration of 134
minutes and the functional rehabilitation of
the patients lasted an average of 6.28 days. In
group II, 8.4 implants / patient were used, all 5
bone grafting procedures were performed
under general anesthesia, and subsequent
interventions were performed under local
anesthesia, the average summary time of
surgery was 385 minutes. The functional
rehabilitation lasted on average 12.8 months.
Conclusions.
The study demonstrated the effectiveness of both methods, but
showed that the alternative rehabilitation method can be performed in
a shorter time, with a smaller number of implants, mostly under local
anesthesia, in a single surgery with a shorter duration. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie "Nicolae Testemiţanu" din Republica Moldova | en_US |
dc.subject | implantation | en_US |
dc.subject | zygomatic implants | en_US |
dc.subject | bone grafting | en_US |
dc.title | The assessment of rehabilitation methods in patients with severe upper jaw atrophy | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Culegere de postere
|