USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/13021
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEni, Stanislav
dc.contributor.authorSîrbu, Dumitru
dc.contributor.authorStrîșcă, Stanislav
dc.contributor.authorGhețiu, Alexandru
dc.contributor.authorNuca, Dumitru
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T19:43:59Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T19:43:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.identifier.urihttps://stiinta.usmf.md/ro/manifestari-stiintifice/zilele-universitatii
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/13021
dc.descriptionUniversitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie „Nicolae Testemiţanu”, Catedra de chirurgie OMF şi implantologie orală „Arsenie Guţan”, Chisinau, Republica Moldova, Catedra de Odontologie, Parodontologie și Patologie Orală, Congresul consacrat aniversării a 75-a de la fondarea Universității de Stat de Medicină și Farmacie „Nicolae Testemițanu” din Republica Moldova, Ziua internațională a științei pentru pace și dezvoltareen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. Insufficient bone volume is difficult to manage in rehabilitating patients with maxillary atrophy. The currently available solutions are: • increasing the bone amount followed by standard implantation • the alternative method by using zygomatic implants without preimplantation bone growth. Purpose. Comparative evaluation of standard versus alternative methods of rehabilitation in patients with severe maxillary atrophy. Material and methods. Study was axed on 12 patients, aged 32 - 67 years, mean age 54.5 years, divided into 2 groups. Patients in group I (7) were rehabilitated by zygomatic implants without bone grafting, and patients in group 2 (5) were rehabilitated by bone grafting, with delayed implantation. Patient data was processed in Sidexis 4.2 and Microsoft Excel. Results. In group I, 4.42 implants / patient were used, 1 intervention was performed under general anesthesia, 1 under local anesthesia with intravenous sedation and 5 under local anesthesia only. The patients underwent a single surgery with an average duration of 134 minutes and the functional rehabilitation of the patients lasted an average of 6.28 days. In group II, 8.4 implants / patient were used, all 5 bone grafting procedures were performed under general anesthesia, and subsequent interventions were performed under local anesthesia, the average summary time of surgery was 385 minutes. The functional rehabilitation lasted on average 12.8 months. Conclusions. The study demonstrated the effectiveness of both methods, but showed that the alternative rehabilitation method can be performed in a shorter time, with a smaller number of implants, mostly under local anesthesia, in a single surgery with a shorter duration.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie "Nicolae Testemiţanu" din Republica Moldovaen_US
dc.subjectimplantationen_US
dc.subjectzygomatic implantsen_US
dc.subjectbone graftingen_US
dc.titleThe assessment of rehabilitation methods in patients with severe upper jaw atrophyen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
Appears in Collections:Culegere de postere

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The_assessment_of_rehabilitation_methods_in_patients_with_severe_upper_jaw_atrophy.pdf2.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback