DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Popescu, Ana | - |
dc.contributor.author | Șoric, Gabriela | - |
dc.contributor.author | Coșciug, Elena | - |
dc.contributor.author | Popa, Ana | - |
dc.contributor.author | Negară, Anatolie | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bodrug, Nicolae | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-25T10:14:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-25T10:14:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-10 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://stiinta.usmf.md/ro/manifestari-stiintifice/zilele-universitatii | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/13254 | - |
dc.description | Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Occupational Medicine, Gerontology Laboratory, State University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Nicolae Testemitanu" Chișinău, Republic of Moldova, Universitatea ”Transilvania”, Brașov, România, Congresul consacrat aniversării a 75-a de la fondarea Universității de Stat de Medicină și Farmacie „Nicolae Testemițanu” din Republica Moldova, Ziua internațională a științei pentru pace și dezvoltare | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction. Geriatric fragility syndrome refers to the elderly prone to
frequent decompensations that occur at minimal demands with the installation
of an increased state of vulnerability and negative prognosis. It is commonly
found in people over 60 and is often accompanied by disability and
polypathology.
Purpose. Assessing the functional status of frail elderly patients in the
context of fragility syndrome.
M aterial and methods. The epidemiological study included 224 patients ,
more > 65 years (73.44±0.38 years), according to the Fried criteria (5
criteria). Frailty syndrome was established in 116 respondents (74.74±0.53
years). Functional decline was assessed by assessing autonomy (Katz,
Lawton), gait and balance (Tinetti score) and muscle strength
(dynamometry) and Nottingham questionaire.The results were analyzed in
the software program Statistics 7.
Results. Based on the frailty criteria was diagnosed pre-fragile elderly - 34.37% of
cases, fragile elderly - 50.44% of cases and robust patients - 15.19% of cases (Figure
1). From the study group was determined the functional aspect of fragility in frail
patients (50,44%), which revealed a decrease in autonomy – Patient autonomy
assessment data (Figure 1) revealed an average value of the ADL score of 10.79 ±
0.11 points and the IADL - 13.19 ± 0.18 points, which represents a decreased selfcare
capacity in the elderly from the study. The mean values of the dynamometry
were 24.40 ± 1.03. Katz score (10.17±0.19), Lawton (11.87±0.28), Lack of energy
(80.49±2.66), reduced physical ability (56.88±2.45), Tinetti (gait and balance)
(18.81±0.47) were found in frail elderly. Physical fragility was determined at
81.03%, reduced physical activity 85.34%, reduced dynamometry 54.31% fragile
elderly cases (Figure 2).
Conclusions. The results of the study reveal the functional status as one of the most
affected aspects of fragility syndrome and highlight the need for early prevention
measures to improve the quality of life of the elderly with fragility syndrome. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie "Nicolae Testemiţanu" | en_US |
dc.subject | functional decline | en_US |
dc.subject | fragility | en_US |
dc.subject | elderly | en_US |
dc.title | Functional decline in fragility syndrome in the elderly | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Culegere de postere
|