|
- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- REVISTE MEDICALE NEINSTITUȚIONALE
- Arta Medica
- Arta Medica 2011
- Arta Medica Vol. 46 No.3, 2011 ediţie specială
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/14323
Title: | Ulcerul postbulbar perforat |
Other Titles: | Perforated postbulbar ulcer |
Authors: | Bujor, P. Bujor, A. |
Issue Date: | 2011 |
Publisher: | Asociaţia chirurgilor “Nicolae Anestiadi” din Republica Moldova |
Citation: | BUJOR P., BUJOR, A. Ulcerul postbulbar perforat = Perforated postbulbar ulcer. In: Arta Medica. 2011, nr. 3(46), pp. 111-112. ISSN 1810-1852. |
Abstract: | Actualitatea: Deși, individualizat de criterii anatomice clare - intersecție cu artera gastroduodenală proximal și unghiul Treitz distal, tema care este
pusă în discuție și astăzi, ca regiune a duodenului (D 1-2-3-4), delimitată cranial de artera gastroduodenală și caudal de orificiul papilei și mai jos de acesta, este sediul unde poate apărea ulcerul duodenal postbulbar perforat.Material și metode: Studiul cuprinde un lot de 12 bolnavi, spitalizați de
urgență cu suspecție la ulcer postbulbar perforat în perioada 2000-2010. În raport cu numărul bolnavilor operați (692) pentru ulcer duodenal perforat
în această perioadă, ulcerul postbulbar reprezintă un indice de 1,73%. În lot s-a constatat un număr de 10 bărbați și 2 femei cu vârsta cuprinsă între
41-60 ani. La internare s-a constatat că durerea și contractura musculară a peretelui abdominal a fost prezentă la 10 din 12 pacienți, iar la 2 bolnavi
tabloul clinic, cât și examenul radiologic de ulcer perforat a fost absent.Rezultate: Referindu-ne la localizarea ulcerului postbulbar perforat constatăm
că în majoritatea cazurilor leziunea a fost situate pe D1.Dacă la 10 pacienții simptomatologia clinică și radio- endoscopică era caracteristică ulcerului
perforat, în 2 cazuri semnele clinice și de laborator au fost necaracteristice perforației ce ne-a impus la un examen suplimentar laparoscopia diagnostică
care a constatat ulcer postbulbar perforat acoperit.Intervențiile chirurgicale efectuate la cei 12 pacienții cu ulcer perforat postbulbar au fost simplă
suturare – 6 cazuri; excizia ulcerului perforat cu piloroduodenoplastie Judd asociat cu vagotomie tronculară bilaterală 4 cazuri; excizia ulcerului perforat
asociat cu vagotomie selectivă proximală – 2 cazuri, cu rezultate bune la distanță. Concluzii: Perforația ulcerului postbulbar duodenal în peritoneal
liber este rară și după datele noastre are o pondere de 1,73%. Actuality: Even though this region is clearly individualized by obvious anatomical criteria - intersection with gastro duodenal artery proximal and distal
with the Treitz angle, which is the topic under discussion even today, the region of the duodenum (D 1-2-3-4), limited cranially by gastro duodenal
artery and caudal by the papilla hole and below it, this is the area where post bulbar perforated duodenal ulcer can occur.Material and methods: The
study includes a group of 12 patients hospitalized in the emergency suspecting post bulbar ulcer, in the period 2000-2010. In relation to the number
of patients operated for perforated ulcer (692) during the same period, the post bulbar ulcer has an index of 1.73%. The group was with a total of 10
men and 2 women aged between 41 and 60. In terms of clinical and objective data on admission was found that pain and muscle contraction of the
abdominal wall was present in 10 of 12 cases and in 2 cases clinical and radiological signs of the perforated ulcer were absent.Results: Referring to the
perforated post bulbar ulcer localization we find that in most cases the lesion was located on the D1 segment. If 10 patients had clinical and radiological
signs which indicated a perforated ulcer, in 2 cases clinical and laboratory signs were uncharacteristic for perforation that required us to a supplementary examination which was diagnostic laparoscopy which showed covered post bulbar perforated ulcer.Surgeries performed on the 12 patients with
perforated ulcer were simple suturing – 6 cases, perforated ulcer excision with pyloric plasty Judd associated with bilateral nonselective vagotomy – 4
cases, and excision of ulcer perforation associated with selective proximal vagotomy – 2 cases, with good long term result. Deaths were not registered.
Conclusions: Perforation of post bulbar ulcer in peritoneum is rare and by our data is 1,73%. Actuality: Even though this region is clearly individualized by obvious anatomical criteria - intersection with gastro duodenal artery proximal and distal
with the Treitz angle, which is the topic under discussion even today, the region of the duodenum (D 1-2-3-4), limited cranially by gastro duodenal
artery and caudal by the papilla hole and below it, this is the area where post bulbar perforated duodenal ulcer can occur.Material and methods: The
study includes a group of 12 patients hospitalized in the emergency suspecting post bulbar ulcer, in the period 2000-2010. In relation to the number
of patients operated for perforated ulcer (692) during the same period, the post bulbar ulcer has an index of 1.73%. The group was with a total of 10
men and 2 women aged between 41 and 60. In terms of clinical and objective data on admission was found that pain and muscle contraction of the
abdominal wall was present in 10 of 12 cases and in 2 cases clinical and radiological signs of the perforated ulcer were absent.Results: Referring to the
perforated post bulbar ulcer localization we find that in most cases the lesion was located on the D1 segment. If 10 patients had clinical and radiological
signs which indicated a perforated ulcer, in 2 cases clinical and laboratory signs were uncharacteristic for perforation that required us to a supplementary examination which was diagnostic laparoscopy which showed covered post bulbar perforated ulcer.Surgeries performed on the 12 patients with
perforated ulcer were simple suturing – 6 cases, perforated ulcer excision with pyloric plasty Judd associated with bilateral nonselective vagotomy – 4
cases, and excision of ulcer perforation associated with selective proximal vagotomy – 2 cases, with good long term result. Deaths were not registered.
Conclusions: Perforation of post bulbar ulcer in peritoneum is rare and by our data is 1,73%. |
URI: | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/14323 |
ISSN: | 1810-1852 |
Appears in Collections: | Arta Medica Vol. 46 No.3, 2011 ediţie specială
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|