- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- REVISTE MEDICALE NEINSTITUȚIONALE
- The Moldovan Medical Journal
- The Moldovan Medical Journal
- The Moldovan Medical Journal 2021
- The Moldovan Medical Journal, Vol. 64, No 3, September 2021
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/18164
Title: | Nonconvulsive status epilepticus – a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge |
Authors: | Munteanu, Cristina |
Keywords: | nonconvulsive status epilepticus;NCSE definition;NCSE diagnosis;EEG criteria;treatment |
Issue Date: | 2021 |
Publisher: | The Scientific Medical Association of the Republic of Moldova |
Citation: | MUNTEANU, Cristina. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus – a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In: The Moldovan Medical Journal. 2021, vol. 64, no 3 (Neuro Congress Issue), p. 58. ISSN 2537-6381. |
Abstract: | Background: Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is certainly an underdiagnosed pathology with chameleonic presentation. NCSE represents a persistent
change in the level of consciousness, behavior, autonomic function, and sensorium associated with continuous epileptiform electroencephalographic
(EEG) changes, but without major motor signs. NCSE comprises a group of syndromes with a wide range of response to anti-epileptics from self-limiting
to refractory forms. It lacks prominent motor characteristic, but may have subtle motor signs (twitching, blinking). NCSE occurs in 8 – 37% of the ICU
patients. The diagnosis and treatment are not straightforward and depend on clinical presentation, etiology, EEG findings. However, it is not always clear
how electrographic activity contributes to clinical impairment or to ongoing neuronal injury. EEG criteria for NCSE are – definite electrographic seizure
activity with typical evolution; periodical epileptiform discharges (EDs) or rhythmic discharge with clinical sign; rhythmic discharge with either clinical
or electrographic response to treatment. More difficult is when there are EDs on EEG but they do not achieve the diagnostic criteria, we must look for:
subtle motor signs time-related with EDs; spatio-temporal evolution; EEG and clinical improvement with anti-epileptics.
Conclusions: Thus, NCSE diagnosis requires high index of suspicion in patients with risk factors and suggestive clinical features. Availability of continuous
EEG is lacking in many centers and diagnosis is delayed. Early recognition and treatment are essential to optimize therapeutic response and to prevent
neurological and systemic consequences. Overdiagnosis and aggressive treatment can contribute to high morbidity and mortality. |
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: | The Moldovan Medical Journal |
URI: | http://moldmedjournal.md/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Congres-Neuro-2021-Spaltul-11.pdf http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/18164 |
ISSN: | 2537-6381 2537-6373 |
Appears in Collections: | The Moldovan Medical Journal, Vol. 64, No 3, September 2021
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|