DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Busmachiu, Irina | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-18T08:57:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-18T08:57:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | BUSMACHIU, Irina. Actual ethical topics of dental implantology. In: MedEspera: the 5th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2014, pp. 223-224. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/18608 | - |
dc.description | State Medical and
Pharmaceutical University „Nicolae Testemitanu”, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Despite of chosen professional branch, medicine imposes certain ethical
principles in medical activity providing moral values of doctor’s daily activity behavior and
attitude. In such a way, the professional ethics sets up a system of standards and rules of conduct,
which reflect some social functions of medicine: doctor-patient, doctor-doctor and doctor-society
relations etc. Stomatology-is a vast profession with high ethical standards, thus stomatologists must
be able to face many difficult situations, being based on moral thinking and high ethical norms.
During the working process in dentistry, between doctor-patient and other relations many '‘banal"
conflicts have already appeared. These misunderstandings could be solved keeping up respecting
certain established bioethical principles.
Purpose and Objectives: to elucidate some values and principles of medical Bioethics, their
impact on Dentistry and Implantology, making evident the scientific achievements in these fields of
Stomatology and finally to solve bioethical problems.
Materials and methods: published monographs, articles and statistical data. There were used
sociological, historical-medical and bioethical methods.
Results: Medicine-is a socio-human domain, in which a doctor has a big significance doing
his job day by day: as a practician, as a psychologist, as a teacher and many others. In different
medical fields doctor works with the people and for the people, he or she is called „ The right hand
of the God”. In Dental Implantology the doctor has the same functions and this medical field has its
special rules and risks. Many difficulties may appear caused by both sides: by the doctor or patient.
On doctor’s side they may be: many risks in anaesthesiology caused by the lack of knowledge in
this domain, the incompatibility of the patient and anaesthesiological substances, the risk to be
infected with venereal diseases caused by inadequate and insufficient sterilization and also the
superficial knowledge in this area, the guarantee of the final result for personal boost and
reclamation (advertising), technological difficulties which are caused by the incompatibility
between tissue and implant (tissue incompatibility). As we know there are 2 types of implants: the
first method „In one step” when the tooth is implanted completely without osteointegration; in such a way all the risks are related to the patient. The second method is „ In two steps” the tooth implant
is fixed into maxillary bone for osteointegration during 3-6 months. After this period of time the
doctor must decide if this method is suitable for patient. In such a way only doctor assumes the
highest risks concerning successful final result. The secondary difficulties shown by the patients
may be: infringement of doctor’s prescriptions before and after the treatment, avoidance to respect
personal hygiene and healthy conditions of social surroundings, the great wish of patients for
implants without being concerned about contra-indications of this method of Implantology.
According to all these facts presented above the large majority of risks are assumed by the doctor.
As a solution to solve the main problems, to avoid the conflicts between both parts, to insure the
stomatologist and patient against future complications, Bioethics offers some principles. One of
them is to sign a special document (an agreement), which confirms that the patient accepts
voluntarily the treatment after first-hand acquaintance with professional medical information. An
“Informed Agreement” can help us to solve the problems which may appear between the doctor and
patient. The lack of this agreement, as a starting point created by the freedom of patient’s self determination and doctor’s obligations to carry out patient’s wishes, established the arbitration for
medical treatment, which in its turn may have penal consequences.
Conclusion: In medicine will always exist the risks and successes concerning the treatment.
Dental Implantology is a medical branch with high risks in which the doctor must pave the way for
success and provide healthy conditions for each patient, but it may generate some embarrassing
positions and conflicts by ethical nature. Bioethics as well as its moral values and principles can
solve half of these problems, that’s why practicing this job-being a stom atologist-we must respect
the principles of ethical code. Thanks to wisdom and high-level of professionalism many people
can smile and they may be happy again and again. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Ministry of Health of the Republic of Moldova, State Medical and Pharmaceutical University Nicolae Testemitanu, Medical Students and Residents Association | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | MedEspera: The 5th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 14-17, 2014, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova | en_US |
dc.subject | Bioethics | en_US |
dc.subject | stomatology | en_US |
dc.subject | implantology | en_US |
dc.subject | ethical conflicts | en_US |
dc.subject | agreement | en_US |
dc.title | Actual ethical topics of dental implantology | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2014
|