USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/19739
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorForna, Doriana
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-27T12:24:54Z
dc.date.available2022-01-27T12:24:54Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationFORNA, Doriana. Classic vs. modern techniques on over-prosthesis. In: MedEspera: the 4th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2012, p. 201.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/19739
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: On the concept of establishing the treatment plan there are a series of principles aimed at restoring stomatognathic system functions by modern or traditional prosthetic ways. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine, according to clinical parameters, the prosthetic version of choice according to patients, requiring over-prosthetics, in relation to the degree of local involvement and loco-regional and what type of over-prosthetics will be required. Materials and methods: Edentulous patients, aged 45-60 years were divided into 2 groups depending on treatment option chosemover-prosthetis in the remaining teeth (LI) and the miniimplants overprosthetis or implants (L2). Establishing the therapeutic option individualization of the treatment, according to the clinical and overall edentulism has been considered. Results and discussion: In all clinical cases of oral rehabilitation a complete functional restoration has been achieved, choosing one of the two therapeutic options. The treatment plan consisted of a whole process of pre-prosthetic and pro-prosthetic procedures, which has been competed in achieving a proper treatment with or without general rehabilitation. Conclusions: A treatment plan in each case must be established, on the basis of the diagnosis; prevention and curative measures eliminating the adverse effects of edentations and future prostheses.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherState Medical and Pharmaceutical University Nicolae Testemitanu, Medical Students and Residents Association, Scientific Association of Students and Young Doctorsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedEspera: The 4th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 17-19, 2012, Chisinau, Republic of Moldovaen_US
dc.subjectover prostheticen_US
dc.subjectremaining teethen_US
dc.subjectimplantsen_US
dc.titleClassic vs. modern techniques on over-prosthesisen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
Appears in Collections:MedEspera 2012

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CLASSIC_vs._MODERN_TECHNIQUES_ON_OVER_PROSTHESIS.pdf717.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback