USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/20641
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArdelean, M.-A.-
dc.contributor.authorOesch Hayward, I.-
dc.contributor.authorBrandtner, G.-
dc.contributor.authorSchimke, C.-
dc.contributor.authorMetzger, R.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-05T11:20:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-05T11:20:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationARDELEAN, M.-A., OESCH HAYWARD, I., BRANDTNER, G., et al. The duplication of the rectum: presentation and therapy. In: Moldavian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2017, no. 1, pp. 37-40. ISSN 2587-3229.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2587-3210-
dc.identifier.issn2587-3229-
dc.identifier.urihttps://sncprm.info.md/journal-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/20641-
dc.description.abstractAim: to delineate the symptomatic features and to emphasize the necessity of early diagnosis and complete surgical excision of rectal duplications. Method. We undertook a retrospective and contemporary review of all patients. Clinical recordings, preoperative evaluations, intraoperative and histological findings, and current patients’ condition were studied. Results. Age of the six patients ranged from new-born to 13 years. There was a broad spectrum of clinical presentation: two children were seen after previous therapy elsewhere with a mistaken diagnosis of perianal fistula, respectively undefined abdominal pain; two presented with exstrophic duplication of the rectum; one neonate was seen with an anal cleft and one infant with rectal bleeding and retrorectal palpable tumour. Paraclinical investigations established preoperative diagnosis in one patient, aided it in two others, and detected associated anomalies in two further patients. All duplications were “in toto“ removed using laparotomy (n = 1), transanal (n = 1), or perineal sagittal approach(n = 4). All duplications had contact with the rectum. Smooth muscle coat and intestinal epithelial layer were histological demonstrated in each case. Conclusions. Rectal duplications are rare anomalies. Clinical manifestations may include abdominal pain, obstipation, rectal bleeding, urinary or bowel obstruction, rectal polyp, perianal fistula, perineal abscess, and pelvic, abdominal, retroperitoneal or perineal mass. Early diagnosis avoids prolonged symptomatic treatment and unnecessary operative procedures. Complete excision is curative.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNational Society of Pediatric Surgery of the Republic of Moldovaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMoldavian Journal of Pediatric Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectrectal duplicationen_US
dc.subjectexstrophic duplication of the rectumen_US
dc.titleThe duplication of the rectum: presentation and therapyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Moldavian Journal of Pediatric Surgery No. 1 2017

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
THE_DUPLICATION_OF_THE_RECTUM.pdf1.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback