DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Shor, Elina | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-07T07:32:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-07T07:32:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | SHOR, Elina. Perforated peptic ulcer in children. In: Moldavian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2017, no. 1, p. 125. ISSN 2587-3229. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2587-3210 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2587-3229 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://sncprm.info.md/journal | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/20891 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction. The peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is an uncommon condition in paediatric surgical practice, more than half
of cases are diagnosed predominantly when complicated. However, complications of PUD, particularly the perforation of
the gastric or duodenal ulcer, are life threatening surgical emergency in this age group.
Aim: The aim of our study was to analyse the clinical features, diagnosis and management of perforated peptic ulcer
(PPU) in children.
Materials and methods. The data of children diagnosed with PPU at Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moldova were
reviewed. The patients’ age, sex, anamnesis, clinical features, examination results, operative findings and methods, medication therapy and outcomes were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi2, Student t test, and multivariate
logistic regression for possible risk factors.
Results. There were 18 boys aged 15 to 17 years (mean age 16.5 years ± 0,17 (95% CI: 16,15- 16,85)) included in the
study. Fifteen patients (83.33%) were admitted in the first six hours after their abdominal pain started. Five patients had coexisting clinical events before PPU. All of the patients manifested acute abdominal pain. Physical examination revealed positive peritoneal signs in thirteen patients (72.22%). Radiography showed subdiaphragmatic free air in 8 patients (44.44%);
this was the most important tool for establishing diagnosis. Thirteen patients (72.22%) underwent laparotomy (30.76% of
them were covered with an omental patch, 61.53% were repaired with Judd, 1 patient with resection) and 5 were surgically
treated with laparoscopic simple suture of the perforation and placement of an omental patch. Three patients (16.66%) had
postoperative complications. The average hospital stay was 7,56± 0,39 (95% CI: 6,73- 8,37 days (range, 4-11 days). There
were no mortalities. All recovered fully.
Conclusions. Gastroduodenal perforated ulcer in pediatric age group is an uncommon entity; hence, it is not usually
considered in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen in these patients. PPU should be suspected in adolescents who
manifest acute abdominal pain and have peritoneal signs. Laparoscopic repair is safe and should be the gold standard for
treatment of perforated peptic ulcer in children. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | National Society of Pediatric Surgery of the Republic of Moldova | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Moldavian Journal of Pediatric Surgery: Pediatric Surgery International Conference “Performances and perspectives in the pediatric surgery development”, September 14-16, 2017, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova | en_US |
dc.title | Perforated peptic ulcer in children | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Moldavian Journal of Pediatric Surgery
|