DC Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Razumovsky, A.Yu. | |
dc.contributor.author | Chumacova, G.I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Alkhasov, A.B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bataev, S.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mitupov, Z.B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rachkov, V.Ye. | |
dc.contributor.author | Stepanenko, N.S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kulikova, N.V. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ignatyev, R.O. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-07T08:28:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-07T08:28:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | RAZUMOVSKY, A.Yu., CHUMACOVA, G.I., ALKHASOV, A.B., et al. Esophageal substitution in children. Gastric transposition. In: Moldavian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2017, no. 1, p. 115. ISSN 2587-3229. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2587-3210 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2587-3229 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://sncprm.info.md/journal | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/20902 | |
dc.description.abstract | For a long time colonic esophagoplasty were operations in choice in our institution. From 2009 we introduce stomach esophagoplasty to evaluate the results and long-term outcome of this surgical option as well as
to provide a comparative analysis of this technique and colonic esophagoplasty.
Materials and methods. From January 2009 till May 2015 44 children underwent stomach esophagoplasty
in Filatov Children’s Hospital, Moscow. The patients were aged from 2 months till 13 years. Esophageal atresia
was present in 15 (34%) cases, esophageal strictures – in 16 (36.4%), peptic stenosis – in 8 (18.2%), other disorders – in 5 (%) children. To evaluate both short-term and long-term outcomes we consider the following data:
clinical examination, questionnaires, esophago gastroduodenoscopy, X-ray contrast study of GIT. In 32 children
(72.8%) the stomach was moved through the posterior mediastinum, in 12 (27.2%) patients – trough the anterior
mediastinum.
Complications. In early postoperative period we had the following complications: pneumonia, pneumothorax, gastric-intestinal bleeding, eventration, enterocolitis, jejunum perforation. In the long-term follow up we
diagnosed stenosis of gastroesophagoanasthomosis, aspiration pneumonia, hiatal hernia.
Discussion. Stomachesophagoplasty is more easy from the technical point of view. Operation time makes
from 50 minutes till 2 o’clock and 40 minutes. We had no necrosis of transplant. In 8 children this operation was
made after unsuccessful colonic esophagoplasty. Average stay in the intensive care unit was 6 days. Feeding
behavior of the patients after stomach esophagoplasty is strictly regulated by the compelled guidelines.
Conclusion. Stomach esophagoplasty has its advantages and drawbacks. Our experience presents the
comparative analysis of the outcomes of colonic esophagoplasty and stomach esophagoplasty, guidelines of
how to choose the best way of esophageal repair. The above described surgical option gives way to more
opportunities for a surgeon and helps to improve treatment outcomes in children with esophageal disorders. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | National Society of Pediatric Surgery of the Republic of Moldova | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Moldavian Journal of Pediatric Surgery: Pediatric Surgery International Conference “Performances and perspectives in the pediatric surgery development”, September 14-16, 2017, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova | en_US |
dc.title | Esophageal substitution in children. Gastric transposition | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Moldavian Journal of Pediatric Surgery
|