USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/28979
Title: Male urogenital inflammation status should be considered in infertile couples with recurrent pregnancy loss
Authors: Valeanu Ornela
Valeanu Ion
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: Instituţia Publică Universitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie „Nicolae Testemiţanu” din Republica Moldova
Citation: Valeanu Ornela; Valeanu Ion. Male urogenital inflammation status should be considered in infertile couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. In: Abstract Book. MedEspera 2024. The 10th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors. 24-27 April 2024, Chișinău, Republic of Moldova, p. 578. ISBN 978-9975-3544-2-4.
Abstract: Introduction. Male urogenital infections are one of the causes that can lead to infertility in men. It is believed that nearly 15% of couples with RPL suffer from multiple infections in the urogenital tract. Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is the loss of at least two consecutive pregnancies in the first 20 weeks of gestation. Numerous bacteria and viruses can result in male genital infection, which is considered to have a negative impact on sperm function and quality. Aim of study. Comparative analysis of semen, hormones, and inflammatory/infectious parameters in men from couples with PRL vs. non-RPL. Methods and materials. The retrospective study included 30 men from couples with RPL, mean age 33.76±6.62, and 35 non-RPL, mean age 32.11±7.48, as a control group. A comparative analysis of semen, hormones (FSH, LH, PRL, TT, E2), urogenital inflammation status, the presence of conditionally pathogenic infections, and specific flora in semen and urine was done. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23. Results. The mean values of semen parameters in both groups were within the normal range, but with higher numbers in the study group: sperm concentration: 70.26±11.29 vs 53.54±13.45; progressive mobility: 34.63±8.32 vs 33.22±10.65. Meares-Stamey 2 glasses test found no significant inflammation in both groups (8.37±9.51 vs. 8.08±10.15 for the first voided sample and 8.55±12.32 vs. 10.11±11.21 for the second voided sample). Sexually transmitted infections that were more frequently found in both groups are Ureaplasma species (16.6% vs. 14.2%), Gardnerella vaginalis (13,3% vs. 8,5%) and Mycoplasma species (6,6% vs. 2,8%). The prevalence of infections within the study group was observed. Also, there is a significant difference between groups in the prevalence of non-specific infections: 10 (58.82%) vs. 3 (8.57%). The total testosterone value was lower in the study group compared with the control group: 323.26±72.59 vs. 379.25±45.69. FSH (4.22±3.21 vs 5.60±3.41), LH (4.46±2.79 vs 4.13±4.28), PRL (224.37±186.34 vs 244.69±201.17), and E2 (31.95±18.02 vs 34.44±15.74) were in the normal range limit. Conclusion. Men from couples with RPL present more often with specific and non-specific infections of the urinary tract, with a prevalence of Ureaplasma species, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Mycoplasma species, most of the cases with multiple infections. It is believed that nearly 15% of couples with RPL suffer from multiple infections in the urogenital tract. Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is the loss of at least two consecutive pregnancies in the first 20 weeks of gestation. Numerous bacteria and viruses can resu lt in male genital infection, which is considered to have a negative impact on sperm function and quality. Aim of study. Comparative analysis of semen, hormones, and inflammato ry/infectious parameters in men from couples with PRL vs. non-RPL. Methods and materials. The retrospective study included 30 men from couples with RPL, mean age 33.76±6.62, and 35 non-RPL, mean age 32.11±7.48, as a control group. A comparative analysis of semen, hormones (FSH, LH, PRL, TT, E2), urogeni tal inflammation status, the presence of conditionally pathogenic infections, and specific flora in semen and urine was done. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23. Results. The mean values of semen parameters in both groups were within the normal range, but with higher numbers in the study group: sperm concentration: 70.26±11.29 vs 53.54±13.45; progressive mobility: 34.63±8.32 vs 33.22±10.65. Meares-Stamey 2 glasse s test found no significant inflammation in both groups (8.37±9.51 vs. 8.08±10.15 for the first voided sample and 8.55±12.32 vs. 10.11±11.21 for the second voided sample). Sexually tra nsmitted infections that were more frequently found in both groups are Ureaplasma spec ies (16.6% vs. 14.2%), Gardnerella vaginalis (13,3% vs. 8,5%) and Mycoplasma species (6,6% vs. 2, 8%). The prevalence of infections within the study group was observed. Also, there is a signif icant difference between groups in the prevalence of non-specific infections: 10 (58.82%) vs. 3 (8.57%). The total testosterone value was lower in the study group compared with the control group: 323.26±72. 59 vs. 379.25±45.69. FSH (4.22±3.21 vs 5.60±3.41), LH (4.46±2.79 vs 4.13±4.28), PRL (224.37±186.34 vs 244.69±201.17), and E2 (31.95±18.02 vs 34.44±15.74) were in the normal range limit. Conclusion. Men from couples with RPL present more often with spe cific and non-specific infections of the urinary tract, with a prevalence of Ur eaplasma species, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Mycoplasma species, most of the cases with multiple infections.
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: MedEspera 2024
URI: https://ibn.idsi.md/collection_view/3104
http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/28979
ISBN: 978-9975-3544-2-4
Appears in Collections:MedEspera 2024

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MEsp24_578.pdf348.57 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback