| DC Field | Value | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | Bondarenko, Anastasiia | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hilfanova, Anna | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-09-14T11:17:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-09-14T11:17:54Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | BONDARENKO, Anastasiia and Anna HILFANOVA. Neutropenia as a marker of primary immunodeficiency. In: Conferinţă internaţională "Pediatria fără frontiere", 19-20 iunie 2026. Ediția 2/ sub redacţia: Svetlana Şciuca. Chişinău : [s. n.], 2026, p. 152. ISBN 978-5-85748-419-7. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-5-85748-419-7 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/33624 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction. Neutropenia is a heterogeneous group of disorders with different
etiological factors, including inborn errors of immunity. Congenital neutropenia may
present as isolated neutropenia or as part of broader syndromic disorders. Management
strategies include wide spectrum of approaches such as infection prophylaxis,
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy, hematopoietic stem cell
transplantation and others. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying genetic
neutropenia not only enhances diagnostic precision but also opens avenues for targeted
therapies.
Materials/Methods. Ukrainian Registry for primary immunodeficiencies was
reviewed in order to identify the patients with neutropenia and to analyze the genetic
spectrum of neutropenia and the impact of genetic testing on treatment choices.
Results. 118 patients with neutropenia were identified, in 63/118 (53.4%)
neutropenia was an isolated manifestation, in others it was combined with other
cytopenias, T- or B-cell immunodeficiency or syndromic features. 67 out of 118 (56.7%)
of patients have genetical confirmation: ELANE - 9, HAX1 – 3, SBDS - 5, SRP54 – 1,
FAS – 5, CD40L – 2, PIK3CD – 3 and 1 PIK3CD+TACI, TACI - 8, NFKB1 – 1, G6PТ1
– 2, TINF2 – 1, TERT – 1, DCK1+TCN2 – 1, RTEL1 – 5, ERCC6L2 – 2, FANCA -1,
FANCD2 – 1, DADA2 – 2, GATA2 – 4, AK-2 – 1, CXCR4 – 5, ARPC1B – 1, VPS13B
– 1, KMT2D - 1. In the majority of cases (55 out of 67, 82%) the genetic diagnosis was
crucial for the choice of treatment management, moving into the decision of HSCT in 22
patients, rapamycin in patients with ALPS (FAS) and APDS, monitoring and IG
substitution therapy for associated antibody deficiency, metabolic drugs in glycogenosis
due to G6PТ1 defect.
Conclusion. In the majority of genetically confirmed cases of neutropenia was a
part of a syndromic diagnosis. Awareness of neutropenia as possible feature of PID and
genetic testing opens up opportunities for diagnosis, which may be crucial in the choice
of therapy. Advances in genetic testing, especially next-generation sequencing, have
improved diagnostic accuracy and enabled early intervention. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Academia de Ştiinţe a Moldovei, Ministerul Sănătăţii al Republicii Moldova, Universitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie "Nicolae Testemiţanu", Institutul Mamei şi Copilului | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Conferinţă internaţională "Pediatria fără frontiere", 19-20 iunie 2026. Ediția 2, Chișinău, Republica Moldova | en_US |
| dc.title | Neutropenia as a marker of primary immunodeficiency | en_US |
| dc.type | Other | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Conferinţă internaţională "Pediatria fără frontiere", 19-20 iunie 2026. Ed. 2: [rezumate]
|