USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/33728
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGîrbu, Lucia-
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-06T08:03:07Z-
dc.date.available2026-10-06T08:03:07Z-
dc.date.issued2026-
dc.identifier.citationGÎRBU, Lucia. PiCCO-Guided hemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shock complicated by arrhythmias and acute pulmonary edema. Revista de Ştiinţe ale Sănătăţii din Moldova = Moldovan Journal of Health Sciences. 2026, vol. 13, nr. 3, pp. 19-26. ISSN 2345-1467. https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2026.3.03en_US
dc.identifier.issn2345-1467-
dc.identifier.urihttps://mjhs.md/api/media-documents/file/MJHS_13_3_2026_red.pdf-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2026.3.03-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/33728-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. Cardiogenic shock (CS) represents the most severe form of acute circulatory failure and is associated with high mortality. The prognostic role of cardiac arrhythmias and acute pulmonary edema (APE), as well as the potential role of advanced hemodynamic monitoring, remains incompletely understood. Materials and methods. This retrospective observational study included 105 medical records of patients with cardiogenic shock admitted between June 2016 and August 2018 to the Holy Trinity Municipal Clinical Hospital, Chișinău. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of monitoring used during hospitalization: the PiCCO group (n = 52) and the standard ECHO group (n = 53). Clinical characteristics, arrhythmia subtype, presence of APE, and in-hospital mortality were recorded. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD and compared using Student’s t-test, while categorical variables were analyzed using the χ² test or Fisher’s exact test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results. Arrhythmias were present in 92.4% of patients, and AF/AFL was the most frequent arrhythmia (56.2%). Mortality did not significantly differ according to arrhythmia subtype (p > 0.05). APE was detected in 60.9% of patients and was associated with markedly higher mortality (75.0%). In-hospital mortality was lower in the PiCCO group than in the ECHO group (36.5% vs 62.3%, p = 0.0112), particularly among patients with arrhythmias and among those without cardiac arrest. Conclusions. The specific type of arrhythmia was not significantly associated with mortality in cardiogenic shock. APE represents a major marker of hemodynamic severity and was associated with significantly increased mortality, particularly in the presence of arrhythmias. Advanced hemodynamic monitoring using PiCCO was associated with lower observed mortality; however, baseline differences between groups limit causal interpretation. Further prospective randomized studies are warranted to validate these findings.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstituţia Publică Universitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie „Nicolae Testemiţanu” din Republica Moldovaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRevista de Științe ale Sănătății din Moldova = Moldovan Journal of Health Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectcardiogenic shocken_US
dc.subjectcardiac arrhythmiasen_US
dc.subjectacute pulmonary edemaen_US
dc.subjectmortalityen_US
dc.subjecthemodynamic monitoringen_US
dc.subject.ddcUDC: [616.24-005.98+616.12-008.318]:616.127-005.8en_US
dc.titlePiCCO-Guided hemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shock complicated by arrhythmias and acute pulmonary edemaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Revista de Științe ale Sănătății din Moldova : Moldovan Journal of Health Sciences 2026 Vol. 13, Issue 3



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback