Elective versus emergency umbilical hernia repair in patients with decompensated cirrhosis: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Introduction. Evidence on umbilical hernia repair in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, ascites, and Child–Pugh class C is limited. In this population, outcomes after emergency repair may reflect both the urgency of the presentation and the greater hepatic, renal, inflammatory, and metabolic derangement present at the time of surgery. Materials and methods. This retrospective single-center cohort study included all 40 eligible adults with decompensated cirrhosis, ascites, and Child–Pugh class C at admission who underwent open primary non-mesh umbilical hernia repair between January 2019 and December 2025. Twenty patients underwent elective repair, defined as definitive repair scheduled after a short period of inpatient optimization, and 20 underwent emergency repair after limited stabilization because an acute hernia-related indication made postponement unsafe. The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury, sepsis, wound infection, persistent ascitic leakage, reoperation, length of hospital stay, and early postoperative clinical-biochemical status. Analyses were unadjusted and exploratory; no multivariable model was fitted. Results. At admission, the emergency group had higher total bilirubin, international normalized ratio, creatinine, leukocyte count, Child–Pugh score and MELD-Na score, and lower serum albumin and sodium (all p ≤ 0.006). During a median elective optimization interval of 4.5 (3.0–6.0) days, the MELD-Na score decreased by a median of 2 (1–3) points. On postoperative days 2–3, every reported clinical-biochemical indicator remained less favorable in the emergency group. Median hospital stay was 14.5 versus 11.0 days (p = 0.038). Thirty-day mortality was 35.0% versus 10.0% (risk difference 25.0%, 95% confidence interval −1.3 to 47.9; p = 0.127). Conclusions. Patients undergoing emergency repair reached surgery with substantially greater clinical and biochemical derangement, had a less favorable early postoperative profile and stayed longer in the hospital, while the mortality difference did not reach statistical significance. Because operative timing was determined by the clinical course, the groups were not comparable at baseline and no causal effect of urgency or of preoperative optimization can be inferred. The findings support early multidisciplinary assessment while an elective operative pathway remains feasible.