USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/9267
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCiută, C.
dc.contributor.authorNovac, C.
dc.contributor.authorPricop, C.
dc.contributor.authorNovac, B.
dc.contributor.authorTomac, I.
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-09T13:53:42Z
dc.date.available2020-05-09T13:53:42Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationCIUTĂ, C., NOVAC, C., PRICOP, C., et al. Factorii predictivi ai complicaţiilor în ureteroscopia retrogradă rigidă şi semirigidă. In: Arta Medica. 2011, nr. 2(45), pp. 219-220. ISSN 1810-1852.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1810-1852
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/9267
dc.descriptionClinica de Urologie şi Transplant Renal, Spital Clinic “Dr. CI Parhon” Iaşi, Al V-lea Congres de Urologie, Dializă şi Transplant Renal din Republica Moldova cu participare internaţională (1-13 iunie 2011)en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. Currently, ureteroscopy is a worldwide procedure with varied number of diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities, including treatment of stones, upper urinary tract tumors, strictures, placement of difficult ureteral stents, and diagnosis of filling defects or haematuria of unknown origin. However, the technique has complications including bleeding, fever and sepsis, ureteral perforation, false passage, urinoma, strictures and, rarely, ureteral avulsion. PURPOSE. Our purpose was to evaluate the ureteroscopies with long hospitalization and to analyse the preoperative predictive factors for the complications. METHODS. We retrospectively reviewed all 342 files of the patients who underwent retrograde ureteroscopy for different reasons between january 2005 and december 2009. Data were abstracted on period of hospitalization, indications for the procedure (urolithiasis – site, number and size, reno-ureteral haematuria, filling defects), bioumoral status, outcome and complications of the method. RESULTS. The mean hospitalization time was 6,53 ± 2,09 days, with a preoperative period of 3,37 ± 1,74 days and a postoperatory time of 2,16 ± 1,08 days. Only 40 patients (11,7%) have exceled this postoperatory period due to a complicated outcome, meanwhile the preoperative time was tidely corelated with the diagnostic imaging methods. The success rate of all therapeutic procedures was 84,74% and the overall and major complication rates was 23,09% and 4,97%. The analysis of preoperative factors showed that preoperative bacteriuria is statistically correlated with postoperatory complications, such as fever and sepsis (p<0.001), and persistent haematuria is linked to stone size and ureteral stent size placed at the end of the procedure (8Ch) without having statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS. Our experience suggests that carefully performed retrograde ureteroscopy is a superb tool for the urologist, either for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. However, when performing an ureteroscopy, one should always bear in mind the possibility of serious complications, including ureteral avulsion or perforation.en_US
dc.language.isoroen_US
dc.publisherAsociaţia chirurgilor “Nicolae Anestiadi” din Republica Moldovaen_US
dc.subject.meshUreteroscopy--adverse effectsen_US
dc.titleFactorii predictivi ai complicaţiilor în ureteroscopia retrogradă rigidă şi semirigidăen_US
dc.title.alternativePredictive factors for complications in rigid and semirigid retrograde ureteroscopyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Arta Medica Vol. 45 No.2, 2011 ediţie specială

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FACTORII_PREDICTIVI_AI_COMPLICATIILOR.pdf144.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback