<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/862">
<title>ARTICOLE ȘTIINȚIFICE</title>
<link>http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/862</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/30340"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/30338"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/30337"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/30336"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-25T02:45:55Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/30340">
<title>Compulsory admissions of patients with mental disorders: State of the art on ethical and legislative aspects in 40 European countries</title>
<link>http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/30340</link>
<description>Compulsory admissions of patients with mental disorders: State of the art on ethical and legislative aspects in 40 European countries
Wasserman, D.; Apter, G.; Baeken, C.; Bailey, S.; Balazs, J.; Bec, C.; Bienkowski, P.; Bobes, J.; Bravo Ortiz, M. F.; Brunn, H.; Bôke, Ö.; Camilleri, N.; Carpiniello, B.; Chihai, Jana; Chkonia, E.; Courtet, P.; Cozman, D.; David, M.; Dom, G.; Esanu, Andrei; Falkai, P.; Flannery, W.; Gasparyan, K.; Gerlinger, G.; Gorwood, P.; Gudmundsson, O.; Hanon, C.; Heinz, A.; Heitor Dos Santos, M. J.; Hedlund, A.; Ismayilov, F.; Ismayilov, N.; Isometsä, E. T.; Izakova, L.; Kleinberg, A.; Kurimay, T.; Klæbo Reitan, S.; Lecic-Tosevski, D.; Lehmets, A.; Lindberg, N.; Lundblad, K. A.; Lynch, G.; Maddock, C.; Malt, U.F.; Martin, L.; Martynikhin, I.; Maruta, N. O.; Matthys, F.; Mazaliauskiene, R.; Mihajlovic, G.; Mihaljevic Peles, A.; Miklavic, V.; Mohr, P.; Munarriz Ferrandis, M.; Musalek, M.; Neznanov, N.; Ostorharics-Horvath, G.; Pajević, I.; Popova, A.; Pregelj, P.; Prinsen, E.; Rados, C.; Roig, A.; Rojnic Kuzman, M.; Samochowiec, J.; Sartorius, N.; Savenko, Y.; Skugarevsky, O.; Slodecki, E.; Soghoyan, A.; Stone, D. S.; Taylor-East, R.; Terauds, E.; Tsopelas, C.; Tudose, C.; Tyano, S.; Vallon, P.; Van der Gaag, R. J.; Varandas, P.; Vavrusova, L.; Voloshyn, P.; Wancata, J.; Wise, J.; Zemishlany, Z.; Öncü, F.; Vahip, S.
Background. Compulsory admission procedures of patients with mental disorders vary between countries in Europe. The Ethics&#13;
Committee of the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) launched a survey on involuntary admission procedures of patients with&#13;
mental disorders in 40 countries to gather information from all National Psychiatric Associations that are members of the EPA to develop&#13;
recommendations for improving involuntary admission processes and promote voluntary care.&#13;
Methods. The survey focused on legislation of involuntary admissions and key actors involved in the admission procedure as well as most&#13;
common reasons for involuntary admissions.&#13;
Results. We analyzed the survey categorical data in themes, which highlight that both medical and legal actors are involved in involuntary&#13;
admission procedures.&#13;
Conclusions. We conclude that legal reasons for compulsory admission should be reworded in order to remove stigmatization of the&#13;
patient, that raising awareness about involuntary admission procedures and patient rights with both patients and family advocacy groups is&#13;
paramount, that communication about procedures should be widely available in lay-language for the general population, and that training&#13;
sessions and guidance should be available for legal and medical practitioners. Finally, people working in the field need to be constantly aware&#13;
about the ethical challenges surrounding compulsory admissions.
</description>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/30338">
<title>Stigmatizarea persoanelor cu tulburări psihice în rândul elevilor</title>
<link>http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/30338</link>
<description>Stigmatizarea persoanelor cu tulburări psihice în rândul elevilor
Eșanu, Andrei
</description>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/30337">
<title>Stigma toward people with mental disorders in adolescents: comparison between Portugal and Moldova</title>
<link>http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/30337</link>
<description>Stigma toward people with mental disorders in adolescents: comparison between Portugal and Moldova
Eșanu, Andrei; Morais, Vitor; Araújo, Joana; Ramos, Elisabete
Background: Mental disorders are one of the most significant public health challenges. Stigma toward people with mental&#13;
disorders decreases help-seeking behaviors, and may be a cause of depression and anxiety. Research on the level of stigma and&#13;
comparison between different countries in adolescence is scarce. We aim to study stigma toward people with mental disorders in&#13;
adolescents, and to evaluate differences between Portugal and Moldova.&#13;
Methods: In a cross-sectional analysis, we evaluated 657 high school students from Portugal and 612 from Moldova. Data were&#13;
collected by a self-reported questionnaire that, beyond stigma, evaluated individual and family characteristics. Stigma was evaluated&#13;
using the Attribution Questionnaire for Children (AQ-8-C) and the Depression Stigma Scale (DSS). Data were summarized using&#13;
means and standard deviations, and comparison was performed using Student t test and analysis of variance.&#13;
Results: The mean (standard deviation) level of mental disorder stigma measured by the AQ-8-C was 32.10 (8.77) in Moldova and&#13;
24.32 (9.20) in Portugal, P&lt;.001. Adolescents from Moldova presented higher values for all items except for “Fear,” with higher&#13;
mean value in Portugal and for “Help” with no significant differences between countries. Regarding the Depression Stigma Scale,&#13;
adolescents from Moldova presented higher values, both for personal stigma [19.84 (4.78) vs 15.09 (5.08), P&lt;.001] and for&#13;
perceived stigma [26.43 (4.30) vs 22.62 (5.15), P&lt;.001]. Stigma levels did not differ according to having or not someone with a&#13;
mental disorder in the class or family.&#13;
Conclusion: The level of stigma toward people with mental disorders is higher in Moldova than in Portugal.
</description>
<dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/30336">
<title>Stigmatising attitudes towards mental health conditions among medical students in five south-eastern European countries</title>
<link>http://repository.usmf.md:80/xmlui/handle/20.500.12710/30336</link>
<description>Stigmatising attitudes towards mental health conditions among medical students in five south-eastern European countries
Harhaji, Sanja; Tomori, Sonila; Nakov, Vladimir; Chihai, Jana; Radić, Ivana; Mana, Tedi; Stoychev, Kaloyan; Eșanu, Andrei; Pirlog, Mihail Cristian
Introduction: Stigmatising attitudes towards mentally ill people are present among healthcare professionals.&#13;
The aim of the study was to evaluate medical students’ attitudes in five medical schools from Albania, Bulgaria,&#13;
Moldova, Romania and Serbia and to determine if psychiatry clerkship improves these attitudes.&#13;
Methods: In the first stage, the study included students from the first and final years of medical school; in the&#13;
second stage, only final-year students were included; The Mental Illness Clinicians’ Attitude Scale (MICA-2) and&#13;
the Attribution Questionnaire (AQ-9) were used in this study. The total sample comprised 1,526 medical students&#13;
in the first stage and 614 in the second stage.&#13;
Results: The analysis of the average AQ-9 and MICA-2 scores between countries revealed significant differences&#13;
(p&lt;0.05). Multivariable analysis showed that female students were 30% more likely to have elevated AQ-9 scores&#13;
than male students (p=0.029). Final-year students had a significantly lower chance of having a higher MICA-2&#13;
score compared to first-year students (OR=0.7; p&lt;0.05).&#13;
Conclusions: Psychiatry clerkship contributes to a decrease in the level of stigmatising attitudes among medical&#13;
students. Further research is required to assess the curricula to achieve better results in reducing stigma among&#13;
future doctors.; Uvod: Stigmatizirajoči odnos do duševno bolnih ljudi je prisoten tudi med zdravstvenimi delavci. Namen&#13;
študije je bil oceniti stališča študentov medicine na petih medicinskih fakultetah v Albaniji, Bolgariji, Moldaviji,&#13;
Romuniji in Srbiji ter ugotoviti, ali praksa na psihiatriji ta stališča izboljša.&#13;
Metode: V prvi fazi je študija vključevala študente prvega in zadnjega letnika medicinske fakultete, v drugi&#13;
fazi pa samo študente zadnjega letnika; v tej študiji sta bila uporabljena lestvica stališč zdravnikov do duševnih&#13;
bolezni (MICA-2) in vprašalnik o atribuciji (AQ-9). Skupni vzorec je obsegal 1526 študentov medicine v prvi fazi&#13;
študije in 614 v drugi fazi.&#13;
Rezultati: Analiza povprečnih rezultatov AQ-9 in MICA-2 med državami je pokazala pomembne razlike (p &lt; 0,05).&#13;
Multivariatna analiza je pokazala, da je bila verjetnost, da bodo imele študentke za 30 % višji rezultat AQ-9&#13;
kot študenti (p = 0,029). Študenti zadnjega letnika so imeli v primerjavi s študenti prvega letnika bistveno manj&#13;
možnosti za višji rezultat MICA-2 (OR = 0,7; p &lt; 0,05).&#13;
Zaključki: Psihiatrična praksa prispeva k zmanjšanju stopnje stigmatizirajočega odnosa med študenti medicine.&#13;
Potrebne so nadaljnje raziskave za oceno učnih načrtov za doseganje boljših rezultatov pri zmanjševanju&#13;
stigmatizacije med bodočimi zdravniki.
</description>
<dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
