Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Transurethral „en bloc“ resection technique in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Vladanov, Ivan
dc.contributor.author Pleșacov, Alexei
dc.contributor.author Colta, Artur
dc.contributor.author Ceban, Emil
dc.contributor.author Ghicavii, Vitalii
dc.contributor.author Scutelnic, Ghenadie
dc.date.accessioned 2022-01-20T13:19:20Z
dc.date.available 2022-01-20T13:19:20Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.citation VLADANOV, Ivan, PLESACOV, Alexei, COLTA, Artur, CEBAN, Emil, GHICAVII, Vitalii, SCUTELNIC, Ghenadie. Transurethral „en bloc“ resection technique in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. In: Archives of the Balcan Medical Union. 2020, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 257-263. https://doi.org/10.31688/ABMU.2020.55.2.07 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2558-815X
dc.identifier.uri https://umbalk.org/transurethral-en-bloc-resection-technique-in-non-muscle-invasive-bladder-cancer/
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.31688/ABMU.2020.55.2.07
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/19592
dc.description Republican Clinical Hospital „Timofei Mosneaga“, Department of Urology and Surgical Nephrology, State University of Medicine and Pharmacy „Nicolae Testemitanu“, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova en_US
dc.description.abstract ABSTRACT. Introduction. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumours (TURBT) is the standard approach to bladder tumour removal; however, it has several disadvantages. The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of „en bloc“ resection of non-muscle invasive bladder tumours (ERBT) by using the conventional monopolar „Hook“ resection electrode. Material and methods. ERBT and TURBT procedures were conducted in 67 and in 85 patients respectively, diagnosed with superficial bladder tumours. In the ERBT group, the tumours were removed retrograde en bloc, under direct vision, via a conventional monopolar „Hook“ electrode. Clinical pathological, intra-operative and post-operative patients’ data were compared retrospectively between both groups (ERBT and TURBT). Results. Of the 152 patients, 67 underwent ERBT and 85 were treated with TURBT. Both groups were comparable in clinical characteristics. ERBT has been performed as safely and effectively as TURBT. There were no significant differences in the operative time and intraoperative or postoperative surgical complications. The comparative recurrence rates were similar for both groups during up to 24-month follow-up. The detrusor muscle fibers were histologically identified in 100% of ERBT tumour samples and marginal tumour bases, and only in 80% of post-TURBT samples. Conclusions. ERBT is a feasible and safe technique for removing superficial bladder tumours using a monopolar „Hook“ resection, with the same advantages of a proper tumour resection, as well as possibility to collect good quality tumour samples and bladder tumour base specimen for pathological diagnosis and staging compared to standard TURBT. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher ALL Publishing House en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Archives of the Balkan Medical Union en_US
dc.subject en bloc resection en_US
dc.subject non-muscle invasive bladder cancer en_US
dc.subject ERBT en_US
dc.subject TURBT en_US
dc.title Transurethral „en bloc“ resection technique in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer en_US
dc.title.alternative Technique de la résection transurétrale „en-bloc“ du cancer de la vessie sans envahissement du muscle en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics