Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Frailty syndrome in heart failure: from definition to biomarkers

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ivanes, Anastasia A.
dc.contributor.author Vetrilă Snejana, Boris
dc.contributor.author Grib, Livi T.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-09T10:36:11Z
dc.date.available 2025-10-09T10:36:11Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.identifier.citation IVANES, Anastasia A.; Snejana B. VETRILA and Livi T. GRIB,. Frailty syndrome in heart failure: from definition to biomarkers. Romanian Journal of Medical Practice [on-line]. September 2025, Vol. 20, nr. 3, p. 326-331. DOI 10.37897/rjmp.2025.3.8. en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://rjmp.com.ro/articles/2025.3/RJMP_2025_3_Art-08.pdf
dc.identifier.uri DOI: 10.37897/RJMP.2025.3.8
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/31239
dc.description.abstract Background. In an aging society, ensuring quality of life has become a major public health priority. Rising life expectancy and the high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors have contributed to a global increase in heart failure (HF), currently affecting over 64 million people. At the same time, frailty syndrome (FS) – once considered a condition of the elderly – is now recognized in younger adults as well, categorized as early frailty (<65 years) and late frailty (≥65 years). FS is a multidimensional condition characterized by diminished physiological reserves and increased vulnerability to stressors, which significantly contributes to disability, hospitalizations, and mortality among patients with HF. This review aims to synthesize recent evidence on the definition, assessment, and prognostic value of biomarkers related to FS in individuals with HF. Materials and methods. This review analyzes 10 peer-reviewed studies published between 2022 and 2025, selected from PubMed, NCBI, and Google Scholar. The selected articles focused on frailty in the context of HF, including clinical definitions, diagnostic tools, and relevant biomarker profiles. Results. The concept of frailty has evolved from the Fried physical phenotype model to broader frameworks encompassing physical, psychosocial, and cognitive domains. Biomarkers with diagnostic and prognostic relevance in FS include inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF-α, CRP), oxidative stress indicators, hormonal decline markers (testosterone, DHEA-S), and sarcopenia-related markers (myostatin, serum creatinine). Moreover, emerging research areas – such as adiponectin levels, epigenetic regulation, and gut microbiota composition – have been implicated in the pathophysiology of frailty in HF. Conclusions. Frailty syndrome is a major determinant of adverse outcomes in patients with HF, regardless of age. The identification of specific biomarkers offers promising avenues for early diagnosis, individualized risk stratification, and targeted interventions. Integrating biomarker-based assessments into routine clinical practice could enhance prognostic precision and alleviate the healthcare burden associated with HF and frailty. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Romanian Journal of Medical Practice en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Amaltea Medical Publishing House (AMPH) en_US
dc.subject frailty syndrome en_US
dc.subject heart failure en_US
dc.subject inflammation en_US
dc.subject ageing en_US
dc.subject biomarkers en_US
dc.title Frailty syndrome in heart failure: from definition to biomarkers en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics