Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Late fetal growth restriction: diagnostic challenges and contemporary induction strategies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Caproș, Hristiana
dc.contributor.author Surguci, Mihai
dc.contributor.author Burac, Mihaela
dc.contributor.author Bologan, Ion
dc.date.accessioned 2026-06-29T09:14:47Z
dc.date.available 2026-06-29T09:14:47Z
dc.date.issued 2026
dc.identifier.citation CAPROȘ, Hristiana; Mihai SURGUCI; Mihaela BURAC and Ion BOLOGAN. Late fetal growth restriction: diagnostic challenges and contemporary induction strategies. 2026, nr. 6 (84). ISSN 2409-563X. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2409-563X
dc.identifier.uri http://scimedicus.ru/medicus-no-6-84-june/post/late-fetal-growth-restriction-diagnostic-challenges-and-contemporary-induction-strategies
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/33421
dc.description.abstract Fetal growth restriction (FGR) remains one of the major challenges of modern obstetrics. Late-onset FGR, diagnosed after 32 weeks of gestation, is the most frequent clinical form and is characterized by subtle Doppler abnormalities and preserved fetal compensatory mechanisms, making obstetrical management particularly complex. Objective. To analyze current diagnostic criteria for late fetal growth restriction and to evaluate recent evidence regarding induction of labour methods in pregnancies complicated by this pathology. Material and methods. A narrative review of recent literature was performed, focusing on modern diagnostic standards established after the Delphi consensus and comparative clinical studies evaluating mechanical and pharmacological induction methods in late FGR pregnancies. Results. The Delphi consensus improved diagnostic standardization by integrating biometric and Doppler criteria. Recent studies demonstrate that mechanical induction methods, particularly Foley balloon and extra-amniotic balloon, are associated with lower rates of uterine tachysystole, cesarean delivery for fetal distress, and neonatal intensive care admission compared with dinoprostone. Conclusions. Late fetal growth restriction requires precise prenatal diagnosis and individualized obstetrical management. Mechanical cervical ripening methods currently appear to offer better maternal and fetal tolerance in many clinical situations. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Publishing House “Scientific survey” en_US
dc.relation.ispartof MEDICUS en_US
dc.subject late fetal growth restriction en_US
dc.subject induction of labour en_US
dc.subject Foley balloon en_US
dc.subject placental insufficiency en_US
dc.subject Doppler velocimetry en_US
dc.subject.ddc UDC 61 en_US
dc.title Late fetal growth restriction: diagnostic challenges and contemporary induction strategies en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics