|
- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2018
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/11222
Title: | Evaluation of methods for determining the ototoxicity of drug substances |
Authors: | Spinu, Cristina Lupu, Roman Podgornii, Ana Nicolai, Eugeniu |
Keywords: | ototoxicity;monitoring;methods;drug substances |
Issue Date: | 2018 |
Publisher: | MedEspera |
Citation: | SPINU, Cristina, LUPU, Roman, PODGORNII, Ana, NICOLAI, Eugeniu. Evaluation of methods for determining the ototoxicity of drug substances. In: MedEspera: the 7th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2018, p. 276-277. |
Abstract: | Introduction. There are several options for monitoring ototoxic changes. Many ototoxicity
monitoring protocols are based on the ototoxic profile of platinum in chemotherapy (eg cisplatin)
and aminoglycoside antibiotics (Gentamycin, Tobramycin, Kanamycin, Streptomycin, etc.)
because they are widely used and have a relatively high incidence in the ototoxic events.
However, other ototoxins such as difluoromethylnitrine, loop diuretics and salicylates can cause
a wide variety of other audiometric configurations. Therefore, for a drug with a poorly defined
ototoxic or ototoxic profile, It is very important to monitor the ototoxicity of the drugs whether
or not they cause hearing loss and cause changes that have met the criteria for adverse effects.
Aim of the study. Systematization of data about the methods and techniques for determining the
ototoxicity of the drug by advanced bibliographic study.
Materials and methods. 167 abstracts and scientific articles from the Cochrane Electronic
Library and the MEDLINE database.
Results. The bibliographic study highlighted three basic primary approaches in the monitoring of
drug ototoxicity (87% of sources): conventional audiometry, high frequency audiometry and
ototacoustic emissions. Another technique (present in about 13% of the investigated materials),
such as the auditory brain response, can be used for a particular patient, but it is not a standard
monitoring technique, although it can also be a criteria for detecting changes in auditory system.
Conclusions. A variety of methods exist for monitoring ototoxicity of drug substances in the
local therapy of auricular pathologies. Some are designed either for the early detection of
ototoxicity and some in a simple evaluation for obtaining additional information about ototoxic
changes and and its site of lesion. |
URI: | https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/Abastract-Book-2018.pdf http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/11222 |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2018
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|