- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2020
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/12096
Title: | Predictability of implant-supported restorations in the esthetic zone |
Authors: | Sarivan, Ciprian |
Keywords: | prosthetic restoration;Pink Esthetic Score;White Esthetic Score |
Issue Date: | 2020 |
Publisher: | MedEspera |
Citation: | SARIVAN, Ciprian. Predictability of implant-supported restorations in the esthetic zone. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, p. 345. |
Abstract: | Background. The goal of modern dentistry is to create the most aesthetical dental restoration
for the patient. It is essential to use tools and techniques that allow to make a predictable dental
implant-based restoration. The specialty literature proposes a variety of indices that help
doctors to evaluate the complexity of clinical case and predictability of future restorations.
Some of them are: Peri-Implant and Crown Index [PICI], Implant Crown Aesthetic Index
[ICAI], Pink Esthetic Score/White Esthetic Score [PES/WES], Pink Esthetic Score
[PES], and SAC ITI Tool (Straightforward, Advanced, Complex).
Case report. Six patients (aged between 27 and 43 years old) have been included in the
research. All cases were 1 and 2 implant restorations in the esthetic area of the upper jaw. From
6 cases 3 were with missing central incisors 2 with lateral incisors and 1 canine. The SAC
classification was applied in order to assess the predictability of treatment which included 12
parameters required for assessment prior to implant placement. Each parameter was scored
from 1 to 3, the closer to value 3, the higher is the esthetic risk and lower the success rate. The
other score applied after provisional crown insertion was the Furhauser pink esthetic score
(PES) which includes 7 parameters for evaluation of treatment results in time. The score was
periodically assessed at 6 and 12 months after placement of prosthetic restorations.
Conclusions. The use of assessment tool prior to surgery provides a vision of mostly common
causes of esthetic failures in single tooth restorations in the esthetic area of maxilla. The esthetic
risk parameters help the doctors to understand the risk and possible ways of its diminishing
even before of implant placement. The PES/WES scores provide an insight into the
predictability of prosthetic restoration which is a key factor of treatment planning in order to
obtain both surgical and prosthetic approaches for optimal results. |
URI: | https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12096 |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2020
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|