USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/13559
Title: Studiu comparativ de corecţie a ischemiei critice la pacienţii diabetici cu ocluzia segmentului popliteo-tibial
Other Titles: Correction of critical ischemia in diabetic patients with popliteo-tibial occlusion: a comparative study
Authors: Cerevan, E.
Jardan, D.
Barat, S.
Conţu, O.
Cemîrtan, R.
Bernaz, E.
Issue Date: 2015
Publisher: Asociaţia chirurgilor “Nicolae Anestiadi” din Republica Moldova
Citation: CEREVAN, E., JARDAN, D., BARAT, S., et al. Studiu comparativ de corecţie a ischemiei critice la pacienţii diabetici cu ocluzia segmentului popliteo-tibial = Correction of critical ischemia in diabetic patients with popliteo-tibial occlusion: a comparative study. In: Arta Medica. 2015, nr. 3(56), p. 22. ISSN 1810-1852.
Abstract: Introducere: Scopul lucrării este analiza rezultatelor corecţiei ischemiei critice cauzate de ocluzia segmentului popliteo-tibial la pacienţii cu diabet zaharat. Material şi metode: S-a efectuat analiza cazurilor de corecţie a ischemiei critice în ocluzia segmentului popliteo-tibial la pacienţii cu diabet zaharat. În studiu au fost incluşi 96 pacienţi, 20 (20,8%) femei și 76 (79,2%) bărbați, cu vîrsta medie 61,3±0,54 ani; 92 (95,8%) pacienţi avînd diabet zaharat de tip II. Douăzeci şi nouă (30,2%) pacienţi au prezentat gradul III de ischemie şi 67 (69,8%) pacienti – gradul IV (Fontaine). Rezultate: Pacienţii au fost divizați în 2 grupuri. Primul grup: pacienții cu tratament conservativ – 54 (56,2%); grupul doi: tratament endovascular – 42 (43,8%) pacienți. În grupul I, la 35 pacienţi (64,8%) s-au efectuat amputaţii majore, la 19 pacienți (35,2%) – amputaţii minore, timpul de spitalizare fiind de 27±3 zile. În grupul II, la 4 pacienţi (10,2%) s-au efectuat amputaţii majore, la 17 pacienţi (40,1%) s-au efectuat amputaţii minore, timpul de spitalizare fiind 19±2 zile. Concluzii: Tratamentul endovascular este cea mai eficientă metodă de corecţie a ischemiei critice la pacienţii diabetici cu ocluzia segmentului popliteo-tibial, rata de salvare a extremităţilor fiind 89,8%, comparativ cu 35,2% - în tratamentul conservativ.
Introduction: The aim of study was to analyze the results of two methods of correction of critical ischemia in diabetic patients with popliteo-tibial occlusion. Material and methods: A retrospective study of diabetic patients undergoing correction for critical ischemia in popliteo-tibial occlusion was performed. The observed group included 96 patients, 20 women (20.8%) and 76 men (79.2%), average age 61.3±0.54 years; 92 (95.8%) patients with type II diabetes. Twenty nine (30.2%) patients with grade III ischemia, and 67 (69.8%) patients with grade IV ischemia (Fontaine). Results: The patients were divided into two groups: first group – patients with conservative treatment – 54 (56.2%); second group: patients with endovascular interventions – 42 (43.8%) patients. In the first group 35 patients (64.8%) had major amputations, while minor amputations were done in 19 patients (35.2%) with average hospitalization time of 27±3 days. In the second group – 4 patients (10.2%) had major amputations, while minor amputations were done in 17 patients (40.1%) with average hospitalization time of 19±2 days. Conclusions: The endovascular treatment is the most efficient method of critical ischemia correction in diabetic patients with popliteo-tibial occlusion; the rate of limb salvage is 89.8% comparing to 35.2% in conservative treatment.
URI: http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/13559
ISSN: 1810-1852
Appears in Collections:Arta Medica Vol. 56 No 3, 2015 ediție specială



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback