USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/18117
Title: The role of microelectrode recording during Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus in patients with Parkinson’s disease
Authors: Andrușca, Alexandru
Gavriliuc, Olga
Synowitz, Michael
Paschen, Steffen
Mehdorn, Maximilian H.
Falk, Daniela
Deuschl, Günther
Helmers, Ann-Kristin
Keywords: STN;DBS;mMER;outcome;complications
Issue Date: 2021
Publisher: The Scientific Medical Association of the Republic of Moldova
Citation: ANDRUSCA, Alexandru, GAVRILIUC, Olga, SYNOWITZ, Michael, PASCHEN, Steffen, MEHDORN, Maximilian H., et al. The role of microelectrode recording during Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus in patients with Parkinson’s disease. In: The Moldovan Medical Journal. 2021, vol. 64, no 3 (Neuro Congress Issue), p. 46. ISSN 2537-6381.
Abstract: Background: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus improves symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. However, the clinical outcome depends on the accurate location of the final electrode. Multiple microelectrode recording is believed to improve the precision, although it prolongs the duration of surgery. We hypothesize that patients implanted in the central trajectory have the same outcome as patients implanted decentrally. Material and methods: This study was carried out in UKSH Kiel and included 556 patients treated from 1999 until 2018 with bilateral STN-DBS (safety population). Pre- and postoperative efficacy data were available from 400 patients. The outcome parameter was the stimulation-induced improvement of the UPDRS for PD. We compared patients with both electrodes centrally to that bi-decentrally. The rate of surgical complications was determined with postoperative imaging. Results: A decentral tract was chosen in 41% of the electrodes (central, n = 471 electrodes; decentral, n = 329). Motor improvement was not different between patients with electrodes implanted bicentral (44.39% ± 22.71) or decentral (43.22% ± 17) trajectory bilaterally (p = 0.5571). Similar results were obtained for the hemi body score and subscores for akinesia, tremor, rigidity, postural instability and gait disorder. The overall bleeding rate was 2.78% and not dependent on the number of penetrations. Conclusions: Outcomes between the groups did not differ and, therefore, the use of mMER is likely to improve the outcome. Comparison with other cohorts does not disclose a higher rate of bleeding complications in this cohort with mMER.
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: The Moldovan Medical Journal
URI: http://moldmedjournal.md/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Congres-Neuro-2021-Spaltul-11.pdf
http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/18117
ISSN: 2537-6381
2537-6373
Appears in Collections:The Moldovan Medical Journal, Vol. 64, No 3, September 2021

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The_role_of_microelectrode_recording_during_Deep_Brain_Stimulation.pdf74.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback