USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/20902
Title: Esophageal substitution in children. Gastric transposition
Authors: Razumovsky, A.Yu.
Chumacova, G.I.
Alkhasov, A.B.
Bataev, S.M.
Mitupov, Z.B.
Rachkov, V.Ye.
Stepanenko, N.S.
Kulikova, N.V.
Ignatyev, R.O.
Issue Date: 2017
Publisher: National Society of Pediatric Surgery of the Republic of Moldova
Citation: RAZUMOVSKY, A.Yu., CHUMACOVA, G.I., ALKHASOV, A.B., et al. Esophageal substitution in children. Gastric transposition. In: Moldavian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2017, no. 1, p. 115. ISSN 2587-3229.
Abstract: For a long time colonic esophagoplasty were operations in choice in our institution. From 2009 we introduce stomach esophagoplasty to evaluate the results and long-term outcome of this surgical option as well as to provide a comparative analysis of this technique and colonic esophagoplasty. Materials and methods. From January 2009 till May 2015 44 children underwent stomach esophagoplasty in Filatov Children’s Hospital, Moscow. The patients were aged from 2 months till 13 years. Esophageal atresia was present in 15 (34%) cases, esophageal strictures – in 16 (36.4%), peptic stenosis – in 8 (18.2%), other disorders – in 5 (%) children. To evaluate both short-term and long-term outcomes we consider the following data: clinical examination, questionnaires, esophago gastroduodenoscopy, X-ray contrast study of GIT. In 32 children (72.8%) the stomach was moved through the posterior mediastinum, in 12 (27.2%) patients – trough the anterior mediastinum. Complications. In early postoperative period we had the following complications: pneumonia, pneumothorax, gastric-intestinal bleeding, eventration, enterocolitis, jejunum perforation. In the long-term follow up we diagnosed stenosis of gastroesophagoanasthomosis, aspiration pneumonia, hiatal hernia. Discussion. Stomachesophagoplasty is more easy from the technical point of view. Operation time makes from 50 minutes till 2 o’clock and 40 minutes. We had no necrosis of transplant. In 8 children this operation was made after unsuccessful colonic esophagoplasty. Average stay in the intensive care unit was 6 days. Feeding behavior of the patients after stomach esophagoplasty is strictly regulated by the compelled guidelines. Conclusion. Stomach esophagoplasty has its advantages and drawbacks. Our experience presents the comparative analysis of the outcomes of colonic esophagoplasty and stomach esophagoplasty, guidelines of how to choose the best way of esophageal repair. The above described surgical option gives way to more opportunities for a surgeon and helps to improve treatment outcomes in children with esophageal disorders.
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: Moldavian Journal of Pediatric Surgery: Pediatric Surgery International Conference “Performances and perspectives in the pediatric surgery development”, September 14-16, 2017, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
URI: https://sncprm.info.md/journal
http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/20902
ISSN: 2587-3210
2587-3229
Appears in Collections:Moldavian Journal of Pediatric Surgery

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ESOPHAGEAL_SUBSTITUTION_IN_CHILDREN._GASTRIC_TRANSPOSITION.pdf194.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback