USMF logo

Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy
of the Republic of Moldova
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh)

Biblioteca Stiintifica Medicala
DSpace

University homepage  |  Library homepage

 
 
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/20948
Title: Ischemic cardiomyopathy management
Authors: Stepan, Ion
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy of the Republic of Moldova, Association of Medical Students and Residents
Citation: STEPAN, Ion. Ischemic cardiomyopathy management. In: MedEspera: the 9th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2022, p.28.
Abstract: Introduction. Ischemic cardiomyopathy is a significant impairment of left ventricular function (LVEF ≤35%) resulting from coronary artery disease. It can be due to prior myocardial infarction or from reversible loss of contractility due to chronically ischemic but still viable myocardium (stunned or hibernating). Case presentation. A 68 years old male presented at the emergency department complaining of mild exertion shortness of breath (SOB) and angina - several episodes per day lasting about 10-15min which worsened 3 days before. ECG: symmetrical, deep, inverted “T” waves consistent with type 2 “Wellens Syndrome''. Troponin I – negative on serial testing. Echocardiography: severe LV enlargement (LVDD – 69mm), moderately impaired LVEF – 34%, anteroseptal and anterior wall hypokinesis, grade III mitral valve (MV) regurgitation (vena contracta 9mm). Optimal medical therapy (OMT): β-blockers, nitrates, trimetazidine, lisinopril and spironolactone have been initiated and titrated to maximum tolerable doses. Second day coronarography: severe (75%) stenosis in distal LM and critical stenosis in proximal LAD. Diagnosis: Ischemic cardiomyopathy, crescendo angina pectoris. Heart failure III NYHA class. The heart team didn’t achieve a sole decision in terms of the revascularization intervention: surgeons advising for CABG and MV repair, interventional cardiologists - for single stent PCI assuming the possibility for MV regurgitation improvement considering ischemic etiology. The decision has been made by the patient. Being afraid of surgery, he underwent PCI with a second generation DES- 3.5-28mm, on LM-LAD, with POT on LM with a 4.5 NC balloon. Ticagrelor 90 mg bid for 12 months and long-life high dose statin were added. At 6 months: Significant symptom improvement: no angina, SOB only on strenuous activity. Normalisation of the “T” waves on ECG. Improvement of LV dimensions (LVDD – 60mm) and function: mild reduction of the LVEF - 48% (Simpson), GLS -9.6/-11.4 %, II-nd degree MV regurgitation. Discussion. Ischemic cardiomyopathy and myocardial revascularization. Conclusion. The patient's choice should be always taken into account. The decision in favour of PCI appeared to be correct. However, viability testing should be done before either revascularisation intervention.
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: MedEspera: The 9th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 12-14, 2022, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
URI: https://medespera.asr.md/en/books
http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/20948
Appears in Collections:MedEspera 2022

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
15._ISCHEMIC_CARDIOMYOPATHY_MANAGEMENT.pdf218.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2013  Duraspace - Feedback