|
- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2016
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/11824
Title: | Treatment options in systemic inflammatory response syndrome |
Authors: | Andreev, Anastasia |
Keywords: | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome;Cytokines;Treatment Strategies |
Issue Date: | 2016 |
Publisher: | MedEspera |
Citation: | ANDREEV, Anastasia. Treatment options in systemic inflammatory response Syndrome. In: MedEspera: the 6th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2016, pp. 240-241. |
Abstract: | Introduction: Patients subject to major surgery, suffering sepsis, major trauma, or following
cardiopulmonary bypass exhibit an ‘acute phase’ inflammatory response. When the inflammatory
response becomes uncontrolled, a Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) ensues. The
etiology of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is broad and includes infectious and
noninfectious conditions, surgical procedures, trauma, medications, and therapies. There are 3 stages in
development of SIRS. In the first stage, following an insult, cytokines are produced at the site. In the
second stage, small quantities of local cytokines are released into the circulation, improving the local
response. This acute phase response is typically well controlled by the release of endogenous antagonists,
the goal being homeostasis. In the final stage if homeostasis is not restored, a significant systemic
reaction occurs.
Materials and methods: Collecting data and research results from published cohort studies,
double blinded placebo RCT, prospective survey with emphasis on intensive care unit patients.
Discussion results: The goal of this project was to establish the effectiveness of new treatment
strategies in treatment of SIRS. Mainly these are based on physiological aspect and pharmacological
one. From physiological treatment can be mentioned Early Goal-directed therapy based on optimising
cardiac pre-load and contractility, delivery of necessary oxygen and insulin therapy. Van den Berghe et
al showed that insulin therapy reduces by 34% the in-hospital mortality and incidence of fatal infection
in diabetic and non-diabetic critically ill patients.
Pharmacological therapies are based on treatment with monoclonal antibodies, activated Protein
C, corticosteroids, antioxidants, serine protease inhibitors as well as filtration and adsorptive therapies
(activated Charcoal; Immobilized antibody systems). Infusion of Activated Protein C reduces the
absolute risk in mortality to 6.1%.Corticosteroids showed a decrease of pro-inflammatory cytokines(IL-
6, TNFα, and E-selectin) and increase of anti-inflammatory cytokines(IL-10). However, the negative
side in using corticosteroids are the pulmonary dysfunction and prolonged time to extubation, as well as
a lot of exclusion criteria for using them. Monoclonal antibodies HA-1A (human monoclonal IgM
antibody) showed a reduction from 49% to 30% in 28 day mortality in patients with gram-negative
bacteremia. The most efficient therapies are filtration and adsorptive therapies. Immobilized antibody
systems assure near-complete removal of TNFα from human plasma as well as reduction to 70% of
cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-6, IL-8 and TNFα). Activated Charcoal absorb almost 100% of
plasma LPS, IL-Ra, IL-1β, IL-8, IL-1a and IFN-γ and 40% of TNFα. In 5 of the 8 adult patients in ICU,
reported resolution of sepsis.
Conclusion: The true incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is
unknown. However, the occurrence of SIRS was characterized by a significantly elevated release of IL-
6 and IL-8, with subsequent increase in the leukocyte count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin.
Prognosis depends on the etiologic source of SIRS, as well as on Associated comorbidities. Strategies
targeting purported triggers, early mediators and even physiological responses to inflammation have
largely been unsuccessful to date. Some of the most prominent areas of research relates to the initiators
and modulation of the pro-inflammatory cascade, methods of extracting pro-inflammatory cytokines and
how genetic polymorphisms may influences the natural history of SIRS in patients. However, some
encouraging data exists with adsorptive strategies to attenuate the hyper-cytokinaemia Associated with
SIRS. Activated Charcoal and Polymyxin B hemofiltration systems have promising features in this
respect, but we look forward to the generation of more exhaustive and definitive research in the future.
Key Words: Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, Cytokines, Treatment Strategies. |
URI: | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/11824 |
ISBN: | 978-9975-3028-3-8. |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2016
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|