|
- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2020
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/12257
Title: | Treatment pecularities in trochanteric fractures |
Authors: | Babalîc, Aliona |
Keywords: | Trochanteric fractures;Internal fixation;Arthroplasty;Surgical technique |
Issue Date: | 2020 |
Publisher: | MedEspera |
Citation: | BABALÎC, Aliona, BALUTEL, Tatiana, COCIUG, Adrian, POPESCU, Victor. Treatment pecularities in trochanteric fractures. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, pp. 101-102. ISBN 978-9975-151-11-5. |
Abstract: | Introduction. Trochanteric fracture in adults overwhelming affects elderly subjects.
Frequency is increasing with population aging despite the development of treatments for
osteoporosis. In elderly subjects, fracture entails a serious risk of loss of independence best
reduced with surgery (usually conservative) that should be undertaken with minimal delay.
Treatment is surgical, of various sorts. Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with intra- or
extra-medullary implants is the most frequent attitude in these fractures, which usually heal
easily. In elderly patients, arthroplasty is an alternative of choice for some authors. These
different treatment modalities are presented, focusing on technical details.
Aim of the study. To evaluate the treatment methods of the pertrochanteric hip fractures
Materials and methods. We studied a pacient-based cohort, overall 209 pacients from
Orthopedic Department of Emergency Medicine Institute during period 07.02.2018 –
07.02.2020.
Results. The majority of pertrochanteric hip fractures was found in women – 65% (137), men
– 35% (72). In 95% the main cause of the fracture was usual (habitual) trauma, 5% - car
accidents. The group was divided by age: 75-96y – 103p (49%), 45-60y – 78p (37%), 45-60y
– 24p (11%), <45y – 4p (1.9%). Fractures were divided by Evans Classification: Evans I – 9p
(4.3%), Evans II – 22p (10,5%), Evans III – 28p (13,3%), Evans IV – 28p (13,3%), Evans V –
118p (56.4%), Evans R – 4p (1.9%). 37% (79p) had benefit from the orthopedic treatment,
63% (130p) have undergone the surgical method. In 76% (99p) was used PFN, in 17% (22p) –
DHS, in 4.5% (6p) – cemented hip hemiarthroplasty was performed, in 2.3% (3p) – DCS, in
1.5% (2p) – uncemented hip hemiarthroplasty, in 0.7% (1p) – total hip joint replacement was
performed. The average length of hospitalization was 9 days.
Conclusions. Even though there is a large pool of surgical methods of treatment, a big number
of patients had the benefit from orthopedics type of treatment. The main cause is the existence
of high anaesthetical and surgical riscs. Surgical type of treatment in case of perthrohanteric
hip fractures allows to prevent different types of complications.Kaufer variables are used to
choose the fixator for the osteosynthesis.The key for better results is to choose an individual
postoperative regimen for every pacient. |
URI: | https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12257 |
ISBN: | 978-9975-151-11-5 |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2020
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|