|
- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- REVISTE MEDICALE NEINSTITUȚIONALE
- Arta Medica
- Arta Medica 2016
- Arta Medica Vol. 61, No 4, 2016 ediție specială
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/12433
Title: | The surgical treatment of the distal metaphysic radius fractures (DMFR) |
Authors: | Cojocari, Ștefan Buzu, Dumitru Ursu, Sergiu Maftei, Dumitru Vacarciuc, Ion |
Issue Date: | 2016 |
Publisher: | Asociaţia chirurgilor “Nicolae Anestiadi” din Republica Moldova |
Citation: | COJOCARI, Ștefan, BUZU, Dumitru, URSU, Sergiu et al. The surgical treatment of the distal metaphysic radius fractures (DMFR). In: Arta Medica. 2016, nr. 4(61), p. 12. ISSN 1810-1852. |
Abstract: | The goal of our study was retro and prospective analysis of the results of surgical treatment of DMFR
Material and methods: In Hand Surgery Department during the period of years 2011-2015 were diagnosed and treated
surgically 546 patients with DMFR (male: female = 1.78: 1).
The average age of 59.3 years for men and women 60.2 years, mean age 58.5 years.
Predominantly rural population with a ratio of 1.5: 1.
Right hand is most often traumatized to the left hand and bilateral with a ratio of 7.75: 3.75: 1.
According to the classification Kapandji (K) and AO in our practice we have met the following cases: 18(3,30%) –
K.I(AO:23-A2.2 - 11 ;23-A3 - 7 patients), 272(49,82%) cases– K.II(AO:23-C1.1), 51(9,34%) – K.III(AO:23-C1.3), 14(2,56%)
– K.IV(AO:23-C1.2), 15(2,75%) – K.V(AO:23-B1.1 - 11 cases ;23-B1.2 – 4 cases), 7(1,28%) – K.VI(AO:23-B2.1 - 4
cases;23-B2.2 - 3; 23-B2.3 - 1 case), 8(1,47%) – K.VII(AO:23-B3.1 - 5 cases ;23-B3.2 - 1 case ;23-B3.3 - 2 cases), 8(1,47%) –
KVIII(AO:23-A2.3), 80(14,65%) – K.IX(AO:23-C3), 25(4,58%) – K.X(AO:23-C2.1 - 16 cases;23-C2.2 - 7 cases ;23-C2.3 - 2
cases).
According to the classification proposed by Максимов А. (2013), the viciously consolidated fracture of the radial distal
metaphysis we have 48(8,79%) cases – K.11(type1 - 4 cases; type2 - 30 cases; type3 - 12 cases; type4 - 2 cases).
Depending on the type of fracture, the extent of stability and impaction, the type and the tilting angle of fragments, the surgical
treatment was performed by the following methods: osteosynthesis with brooches - 149(27,38%); intrafocal osteosynthesis
with brooches - method Kapandji – 269(49,24%) patients; plate osteosynthesis - 67(12,23%); ligamentocapsulotaxia in
external fixation appliance - 13(2,36%); corrective osteotomy – k-wire osteosynthesis – 24(4,40%); corrective osteotomy -
plate osteosynthesis – 16(2,93%); osteoclasia - plate osteosynthesis – 8(1,47%);
In 29(5,31%) cases was determined acute carpal tunnel syndrome, which has intervened by decompression of the
median nerve. In 5(0,92%) cases K.XI (tip2,3,4) was determined carpal tunnel syndrome, the median nerve compression
ultrasonography was determined in the carpal tunnel more than 18% versus proximal, was performed excision of the carpal
ligament and median nerve neurolysis.
Conclusion
· The problem of treatment DMFR far remains current, despite of the successes in the treatment of orthopedic and experience
in the treatment FMDR
· In our study, most patients were treated by the method Kapandji - 269(49,24%), that ensuring a good bone junction,
excluding secondary displacement.
· With a minimum operator volume, exclude the risk of complications and allows a more rapid rehabilitation hand. |
URI: | https://artamedica.md/old_issues/ArtaMedica_61.pdf http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12433 |
ISSN: | 1810-1852 |
Appears in Collections: | Arta Medica Vol. 61, No 4, 2016 ediție specială
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|